It
is the purpose and scope of this work to
establish a rational foundation for
understanding Nature from one single principle,
law, cause, or "logic" of operation. The method
employed here, never used before in the form
presented herein, is modeled from Mathematics
where we start with certain primary
propositions, called axioms, and then using
rational thinking and only rational deductive
thinking an entire theory is build
up.
Unlike
for Mathematics (where those axioms can be
any proposition that cannot be derived
from anything else and cannot lead to rational
contradictory results), in TRUTON
The Rational Unified Theory Of
Nature, those primary propositions, in
addition, must have physical roots and
connotations that cannot "offend" our given
common sense.
Our
modeled mathematical method of discovering
things in Nature, should not be confused with
the long standing method of using Mathematics as
a tool in deriving results. We will not use
Mathematics per se, but instead we
will use the method or the model of Mathematics
of how it obtains its results and nothing
else.
TRUTON
in a way is, par excellence, a direct outgrow
from Classical Physics and its followers
initiated methodically by
Sir Isaac Newton.
On
July 5, 1686, Sir Isaac Newton published his
seminal and revolutionary work entitled
Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia
Mathematica (Mathematical Principles of
Natural Philosophy) or in short
Principia. The object of Principia was to
establish in a rational fashion a "mechanical"
Universe where all motions studied to be able to
be derived from coherent mathematicalmechanical
principles. It was Newton who first coined the
term Rational Mechanics to distinguish it from
the study of Empiric Mechanics.
Newton,
following into the steps of Copernicus, Kepler,
Galileo Galilei, and many others preceding them,
saw clearly the close and profound
interrelationship that existed between
Mathematics (in his case, the Euclidean
geometry) and Mechanics and how one draws from
another their own existence. In his Preface to
the First Edition of Principia, Newton noted
(Principia, vol. I, Univ. of California Press,
1966, pp. xviixviii):
"The
ancients considered mechanics in a twofold
respect; as rational, which proceeds
accurately by demonstration, and practical.
To practical mechanics all the manual arts
belong, from which mechanics took its name.
... To describe right lines and circles are
problems, but not geometrical problems. The
solutions to these problems is required from
mechanics, and by geometry the use of them,
when so solved, is shown; and it is the glory
of geometry that from those few principles,
brought from without, it is able to produce
so many things. Therefore geometry
is founded in mechanical practice, and is
nothing but that part of universal mechanics
which accurately proposes and demonstrates
the art of measuring. But since
the manual arts are chiefly employed in the
moving bodies, it happens that geometry is
commonly referred to their magnitude, and
mechanics to their motion. In this sense
rational mechanics will be the science of
motions resulting from any force whatsoever,
and of the forces required to produce any
motions, accurately proposed and
demonstrated.
....
I consider philosophy rather than arts and
write not concerning manual but natural
powers, and consider chiefly those things
which relate to gravity, levity, elastic
force, the resistance of fluids, and the like
forces, whether attractive or impulsive; and
therefore I offer this work as the mechanical
principles of philosophy, for the whole
burden of philosophy seems to consist in this
from the phenomena of motions to
investigate the forces of nature,
and then from these forces to demonstrate the
other phenomena; and to this end the general
propositions in the first and second Books
are directed. In the third Book I give an
example of this in the explanation of the
System of the World; for by the propositions
mathematically demonstrated in the former
Books, in the third I derive from celestial
phenomena the forces of gravity which bodies
tend to the sun and the several planets. Then
from these forces, by other propositions
which are also mathematical, I deduce the
motions of planets, the comets, the moon, and
the sea." [Underline and underscore
supplied.]
Then,
recognizing the limitation of his work, Newton
noted his disappointment in his Preface to
Principia (ibidem) with a glimpse at what
future theoretical work may be needed to unlock
the ultimate secrets of Nature (underscore
supplied):
"I
wish we could derive the rest of the
phenomena of Nature by the same kind of
reasoning from mechanical principles,
for I am induced by many reasons to
suspect that they may all depend upon certain
forces by which the particles of bodies, by
some cause hitherto unknown, are either
mutually impelled towards one another, and
cohere in regular figures, or are repelled
and recede from one another. These
forces being unknown, philosophers have
hitherto attempted the search of Nature in
vain; but I hope the principles here laid
down will afford some light either to this or
some truer method of philosophy."
And
at the end of his work, Newton clearly was
disappointed of not being able to discover the
deepest interconnections that govern Nature
from the origin of gravity to the origin of
other forces, (ibidem, vol. II,
pp. 546547), as he noted:
"Hitherto
we have explained the phenomena of the
heavens and of our sea by the power of
gravity, but we have not assigned
the cause of that power. This is
certain, that it must proceed from a cause
that penetrates to the very centers of the
sun and planets, without suffering the least
diminution of its force; that operates not
according to the quantity of the surfaces of
the particles upon which acts (as mechanical
causes used to do), but according to the
quantity of solid matter which they contain
and propagates its virtue on all sides to
immense distances, decreasing always as the
inverse square of the distance. ...
.But
hitherto I have not been able to
discover the cause of those
properties, of gravity from
phenomena, and I frame no
hypotheses; (In the original Latin
that become famous, Hypotheses non
fingo)" [Emphasis
supplied.]
Because
of that impasse which continuously was present
and which was never been able to be overpassed
by all generations that followed Newton, it was
in the end a path that was abandoned altogether
and replaced for the first time with a novel
path containing elements of the irrational with
countless of speculations over speculations.
Indeed, the foundation of Newton's Mechanics
(dubbed today as Classical Mechanics), and which
reigned supreme until the beginning of the 20th
century, was abandoned and replaced first by
Albert Einstein
through a socalled Relativistic mechanics
incorporating, in a novel fashion, irrational
thinking and elements of the absurd, as
follows:
1)
first time, in 1905 with the introduction of
his socalled Special Theory of Relativity
(where Newton's fundamental concepts of
space, time and simultaneity were being
challenged and mashed together into an absurd
and meaningless 4dimensional continuum
called spacetime where to the Euclidean
geometrical 3dimensional space, time was
being added as the 4th dimension of the newly
created space. If t is the time
variable, and x, y, z are the
geometrical coordinates of a point, the space
[x(t), y(t), z(t)] was
transformed into the meaningless
4dimensional space
[x, y, z, t] and that
absurdity is being considered today as a
revolution in viewing and understanding
Nature. [sic!]
2)
the second time, 1011 years later, with the
introduction of Einstein's socalled General
Theory of Relativity purporting to be the
theory of gravity where the space itself was
postulated to have a "curvature" and other
properties that where outside of the realm of
Euclidean geometry. Gravity was now being
"explained" through that willynilly
postulate of a socalled curvature of the
space where the Euclidean geometry was
replaced willynilly with the Riemannian
geometry as the true geometry of the physical
space of the Universe.
Once
the gates towards irrational were opened and
various Mathematical models were introduced that
had nothing to do with the reality and the
physical world of Nature they purported to
represent, the landscape of Physics has changed
in a most dramatic way. New irrational implants
were able now to find a fertile ground for
development. Another irrational nonNewtonian
mechanics, called Quantum Mechanics that
could be renamed as A HocusPocus
Mathematical Theory of the Absurd was
born out of that irrational freedom pioneered by
Einstein. Indeed, that quantum theory was
founded on massive speculations, aberrations of
logic and lack of common sense that were wrapped
up into beautiful and elegant Mathematics that
has had no rational justification for being
associated with the description and the
representation of Nature. In fact, Richard
Feynman the 1965 Physics Nobel Laureate
was not joking when he noted that:

Since
the rational thinking was no longer a
prerequisite in explaining Nature in the new
"modern" Physics and, since the irrational
arguments were gaining tacit acceptance more and
more through the pioneering of Einstein's
Relativistic mechanics and followed by the birth
of a new novel mechanics the Quantum
mechanics, a new illogical speculative
"scientific" climate was able to emerge with
Physics at its forefront followed closely by
Astronomy and subsequently spilled further into
Chemistry.
In
the "new" Physics, more than in any other
Natural Science, willynilly hocuspocus
advanced Mathematics, with no an iota of
justification, began to cover a vast amount of
physical speculations creating in the end
elaborate advanced mathematical theories of
entirely speculative nature. Those speculative
results, in a way, became seductive because of
the beauty of the language of Mathematics that
was able to describe them.
The Physics and Astronomy part of
TRUTON, of course, can considerably be
enhanced and beautified with expressing
those results in the beautiful language
provided by Mathematics as outlined in
here below:
If
TRUTON is designed to be the
exclusive theory of Nature, then
that representation must be
independent of our sense perceptions
and, in particular, to be able to
make sense for born blind people!
How human see and perceive their
environment, as interesting as it
may be, is not part of true theories
of Nature.
The
Theory of Sense Perception
(TSP) as interesting as it may
be, lies outside of the realm of
Physics as its results need not
depend of how the humans or other
livings perceive their surroundings
in various conditions or
circumstances.
For
instance, at best,
Einstein's Special Theory
of Relativity, is par
excellence, a theory of
sense perception
(TSP)
and thus, it needs to
reside outside of the realm
of
Physics!

In TRUTON all forces and concepts of
Nature are real and not fictional
and its results should never ever be
derived from our perceptions of how
we see or perceive certain physical
phenomena from different systems of
references or systems of coordinate
or other particular conditions.
Based
on the fundamental principle that in
TRUTON all of its results must be
independent from any particular
coordinate system, the question that
arise is what model would be
acceptable in here and what
Mathematics can be used. Well,
Continuum Mechanics (known
also as The Rational
Mechanics) is the model suited
for TRUTON where the Tensor
Calculus (and Tensor
Analysis, in general) represents
its mathematical backbone since a
tensor in Mathematics has an
existence independent of any
particular coordinate system.
Physical laws when expressed, as in
Continuum Mechanics, by tensor
equations are universal in the sense
that if they are valid in one
coordinate system, then they are
valid in any other coordinate
system. That beauty of invariance of
tensor equations regardless of the
coordinate system employed makes
that tensor approach universal in a
theory of Nature. So yes, the
mathematical blueprint and
formalization of TRUTON for its
Physics and Astronomy components
must be the one currently employed
in the advanced Continuum
Mechanics.

As the irrational method of "explaining" things
has gradually entered into the mainstream
science, it was not long before cosmologists
began entertaining outoftheblue speculative
concepts as dark matter, dark energy, black
holes, and so on, as being "ingredients" of our
Universe.
The
Universe itself is being speculated as being
originated somehow from a point of infinite
density and temperature that somehow began
expanding and continue to expand. Such a
postulated origin of the Universe defy all
logic, all common sense, and most importantly
all Physics as Physics (as oppose to
Mathematics) does not allow infinite parameters
into its arsenal. All physical parameters of
Nature are finite indeed.
Troubling
questions, that could have triggered an alarm,
such as how a point of infinite density and
temperature could have been formed in the first
place, that is in a blatant defiance to all
Physics and its concepts of describing Nature,
did not stop the BigBang Cosmology to became
the dominant cosmology of nowadays. God, if
there is one, surely is having a field day in
seeing how far off the current physical science
has deviated from the rational understanding of
the Universe's actual origin, formation and
evolution.
A glimpse into the TRUTON's vista is provided
below:
.Nature's
Ultimate Cylcles
(NUCs)

In TRUTON, the willynilly lunatic
BigBang cosmological model is being
replaced with the cosmological model
based on the
grand
ultimate everlasting cycles (GUECs)
of
Nature's spinning megastructures
the
spinoverses
that
are being formed, with our Universe
being one of them.

A
breaking spinoverse surrounded
by absolute
vacuum.

.Those
spinoverses,
whose spin can only increase with time
(because their
axes
of spin
AOS
are not fixed and thus can rotate
freely in space and, as such, an
AOS
rotation of an 180 degrees will result
in a change in the spin's direction),
will ultimately reach a finite
critical upper limit of spin's
magnitude. A
spinoverse
reaching that spin limit of rotation
will break up with its remnant parts
flying apart radially.
.Those
remnant flying parts in the surrounding
vacuum will decompress and transform
themselves into stable base level
entities, to be identified later, that
now continue with their radial gliding
linear motions. They now have became
the seeds for the creation
(through
collisions and accretions with other
remnant parts of other disintegrative
spinoverses)
of new spinning
megastructures, i.e., of
new
spinoverses.
.The
spinoverse
cycles of formation and
selfdestruction
is therefore complete for new
cyclical rounds to commence. Such
cycles
the
GUECs,
thus will continue to exist in
perpetuity.
.Hence,
Nature does not have a beginning nor an
end of existence being, as such, a
given
eternal entity, as oppose to its
spinoverses
(aka, its
universes)
that all possess a finite life of
existence with a beginning and an end,
being thus entities derived all
from Nature.


The
novelty of the new "modern" Physics is its
ability to place, side by side, the irrational
with the rational and mash them
indistinguishable into a mathematical format to
look very "scientific." As long as that "modern"
setting peppered with elements of the irrational
and limitless speculations are allowed to exist,
Natural Sciences are indeed at a very great
peril. A beautiful Mathematics should never ever
replace or be a camouflage for the missing
Physics in deciphering the secrets of Nature.
And that is because Mathematics can be
associated easily with concepts and assumptions
that have nothing in common with Nature and its
modus operandi.
The
flood of speculations that continued unabated in
the "new" Physics has proliferated into all
Natural Sciences. From the many examples that
could be given, we could mention for instance
the ludicrous speculation responsible for the
mass extinction of the dinosaur some 65 million
years ago as a result of some catastrophic
cosmic event generated by the collision of our
planet with some real or imaginary meteor. (As
we shall see, the mass extinction of the
dinosaur with ease can be explained through
rational
arguments
not as an accident, but as a necessity
derived from Evolutionary Biology.)
The
new "modern" field of speculations over
speculations has created indeed an extremely
fertile terrain for writing "scientific"
speculative papers and books all masked under
the elegant costumes of advanced mathematics
that it was employed with not one iota of
justification for its use.
Everybody appeared to be happy of the newly
found bottomless speculative reservoir: the
universities and other research institutions
were delighted of the new found wealth of papers
and books that their members were able to
produce as that wealth was able to justify to
the society (which has been footing the bill) of
the necessity of continuing with the ever
increasing funding.


C
L U B (SMC)





C
A R T E L


Similar
to a "Mafia" Club creating a
protective shield from visibility to the
rest of the society, the Science Masquerade
Club (SMC) of today's "modern" theoretical
physicists has a protective shield of its own,
most difficult to penetrate, vested in an
advanced gibberish mathematics that is
being employed to cover the Club's nonsensical
theories of Nature that are being promulgated to
the masses of the society at large.
Arguably,
today's Science
Masquerade Club
can
be viewed as some sort of a cartel that
for Particle Physics could very well
be called the TAU TAU Quantum Cartel
(taken from the bogus tau particle of
Quantum Machanics).
The
most common and visible protective
shield, that is being used by the
SMC
towards the novice visitors
entering that masquerade Club,
is the posting at its "entrance"
for
intimidation
purposes
typically in the form of a blackboard,
some advanced gibberish
mathematics that no outsider could
possibly grasp, as illustrated herein,
such as that of the popular peddler for
the "new"
particle Physics
(NPP),
Brian Greene of Columbia
University, USA (posted
below)
or that of the much cited Lisa
Randall of Harvard University, USA
(posted in here).
With that intimidating
gibberish posting, the setup is
complete being indeed
foolproof !
BTW,
All
members of SMC,
with
no
exception,
appear to have one basic
commonality:
they
all appear indeed to
be
severely
brainwashed.
And,
that
is done via a "reeducation" program of
controlling the Mind's inferences by
injecting in it
an
amalgam
of
speculative, illusionary, circular and
irrational reasoning mushed together
with aberrations of logic and distorted
unrelated analogies reaching the level
of the
absurd!
(That
nonsensical mushed amalgam, as
noted, is being infused with
some gibberish
incomprehensible advanced
mathematics to appear to the
novice as being highly
scientific in nature. The end
result of all that is the
incorporation of highlevel
gibberish,
nonsensical, incoherent
talk
that appears to be a
trademark, most notable, for
the elite champion members of
SMC.)







.
Arguably,
that
brainwashing
is being propagated
through a
Particle
Physics (PP) Cult
which
is no different, in
essance, than that of a
religious
Cult.
And that is because at
their substratum, they
both have one common
denominator:
their
Irrationality.
The brainwashed members
of a
PP
Cult
and the ones of a
religious
Cult
appear indeed to look
and act quite the same
(pictures
below)...




Brian
Greene's sample of a typical
setup "shield" placed in
front of the visiting novice
newcomers...
The mandatory
Ricci
tensor
(renamed in Physics as the
Einstein tensor) is well
embedded in
there...


As
in the case of "Mafia's soldiers," the work of
those nowadays scientists appears to be
legitimate through the cultivation of illusions
which have not an iota of rationality in them
and which, are being trumpeted to represent the
course of the new, modern abstract physical
science. As such, that new speculative course
(that is being camouflaged with an impenetrable
mantle provided by advanced gibberish
Mathematics) is being pedalled to the society at
large as serving to the advancement and/or the
interests of Natural Sciences and thus, as
serving to the society at large.
The
reality however is sadly different: advanced
speculative, irrational work, wrapped in fancy
advanced arbitrary Mathematics, is
perhaps great for "academic" amusement and
entertainment, but it has no place whatsoever
into the body or development of Natural
Sciences. The plague of that massive irrational
speculative work that now has engulfed the
entire "modern" Physics needs to be eradicated
in its totality if Natural Sciences can truly be
further advanced. It is time that we begin
cleaning our house and dispose of that
accumulated academic garbage. We make no mistake
on the urgency of that
cleaning !
A
Grave LIGO
conCERN

bigtime
science con artists of the
"new"
Physics...

How
more absurd or repugnant this
picture from CERN could
be?
Bottles
of champagne and hard liquor
are part of CERN's Control
Room decor!
Fabricated milestones are
celebrated there with bottles
of champagne that are labeled
accordingly.
Handy perhaps, for celebrating
fabricated staged discoveries
or for being able to
see what one want to
see...
But not to worry, the society
at large is footing the bill
for all that massive
orchestrated charade and
charlatanry!
Nothing, but absolutely
nothing, has advanced our
understanding of the atomic
and subatomic worlds from the
CERN, FERMILAB or LIGO
experiments.

The
experimental part of the "new" Physics
that currently exists
[be
it for instance, at
CERN
(say,
with the much publicized
discovery of the fictional
elusive particle purporting to
be responsible for the origin
of mass
[sic!]
of subatomic particles
(whatever that nonsensical
endeavor is presumed to be)
i.e., of the discovery
of the socalled speculative
Higgs
boson),
or
at FERMILAB, or
at the LIGO
Labs (with the
purported discovery of the
Cosmic Gravitational
Wave which is a monumental
orchestrated hoax),
or
at any other
multimillion/billion dollar
project of the "new"
experimental
Physics/Astronomy]

is made up of mostly fabricated
imaginary
"discoveries" providing, at
best, pseudoscience results
(which never ever needs to be confused
with the real science) and, at
worst, fraudulent results
gained from plain deceit.
The
bogus experimental data received from
the "new" experimental Physics is no
accident and, that is because the
theory behind that data, which is
always preconceived, is flawed at its
very foundation. Indeed, the
foundation of Quantum Mechanics,
the foundation of Einstein's
theory of gravity, of space and time,
of Relativity, the speculative
outoftheblue foundation of
the BigBang cosmological theory or of
the speculative existence of
Black Holes all are flawed
foundations out of which we can get
only flawed preconceived results. All
those willynilly foundations and
representations do no exist in Nature,
but only exist in our deformed
speculative imagination of
Nature.
From particle accelerations or
colliders, we never ever could gain
anything that could advance our
understanding of the nanoworld of
Nature. And that, as we shall see in
the next
section,
is because of Heisenberg's
Observational
Indeterminacy Principle
(OIP)
dubbed today, incorrectly, as
Heisenberg's principle of the
"observer
uncertainty
effect."
[Originally,
Heisenberg used the word
"ungenauigkeit"
("indeterminacy") to
describe his
observationalimpasse
recognition that in the
Englishlanguage version,
incorrectly, was translated as
"uncertainty" and
which, later, was transformed
into a new and different form
and type of
"observer
uncertainty
effect"
known today as Heisenberg's
Uncertainty Principle
(HUP).]


.

Life is good at
FermiLab...

From the speculative cosmological
BigBang phenomenon or the purported
imaginary Black Holes that do not exist
in Nature, but exist only in our own
twisted imagination, we can make
elaborate and costly experiments (such
as the ones from
CERN,
FERMILAB,
or LIGO
Labs)
and claim, in the end, to be a
confirmation of whatever the sought
result we want to get. However, to dupe
the society which is footing the bill
of billions and billions of dollars in
the name of "science" for those
speculative megaprojects that lack an
iota of rationality in them, is indeed
criminal and repugnant to the core of
our entire civilization and that,
cannot go on, and on,
unabated.

There
are a number of ways to be successful
in brainwashing.
A glimpse into the manipulative method
of brainwashing is outlined below.
PS>
Very often that false reality is
amplified by the media
which is sucked in by the science bait
announcements.
.



Brainwashed by a religious
Cult.

Brainwashed
at CERN by a PP
Cult.

In
the search of the eternal and elusive
"truth":
No
one from either Cult, under the mantra
of "reaching the truth,”
has any idea what they are
actually acclaiming or
praising.

That global academic masquerade of the stated
Science
Masquerade Club (SMC),
that has been in existence for quite some time,
cannot go on and on indefinitely. There should
be a time when that wide spread academic
charade, upon exposure, will have to come to an
end.


Abraham
Lincoln

As such, and in response to
SMC,
at
our "trutonian" door, for the adherent members
of the introduced Particle
Physics (PP)
Cult,
we
have placed this posting paraphrased from the
one coined some two centuries ago by Abraham
Lincoln, the 16th President of the United
States:
"You
can
fool
some of the people some
of the time,
you
can
even fool some of the people
all the time,
but
you cannot fool
all the people all the
time."

From
Particle Physics, the bottomend frontier of
Physics the mother of all Natural Sciences,
there is absolutely no evidence that our
understanding of Nature has been enhanced at
all, neither with the advent of
a)
Quantum Mechanics nor with that of
b)
Einstein's Relativity theories.
Indeed,
!


a)
Basic, fundamental questions expected
to be elucidated in Quantum Mechanics
are to this day completely ignored and
left literally in the dark... For
instance, upon the discovery of the
Electron and the Proton, to this very
day, there is no understanding as to
WHY the Electron and the Proton have
electric charges in the first place,
nor is there an understanding as to WHY
those respective charges are
exactly equal in magnitude.
.Also,
there is no existing explanation as to
WHY the negative charge is being
associated to the Electron as a
negative quantity usually represents a
deficit of some sort, nor is there a
rationality as to WHY to the Proton it
was associated a positive charge as a
positive quantity is usually associated
to a surplus of some sort.
(The
irony, as we shall see, is
that the Proton represents in
fact an energy "hole" and
thus, an energy deficit, while
the Electron represents an
energy "peak" and thus, an
energy surplus and, as such,
their charges need to be
reversed
[sic!]).
With the recognition
that the Proton is an
energy "hole," the
explanation of
gravity
becomes now
superfluous!


WHAT
an electric charge actually is,
besides being a "property" of
matter?, or HOW and WHERE those
particles store and carry their
respective electric charges? are
examples of some basic fundamental
questions that today are not even being
asked, much less entertained, in that
truly repugnant Quantum Mechanics. No
Mathematics indeed can fill up or mask
that void of knowledge! The naked
ignorance is there, in plain sight, as
no mathematical shield is able to be
found in Quantum Mechanics to cover
that profound gap of knowledge, from
the many, that currently
exist.


!


b)
Contrary to the current existing
prevailing view, there is nothing, but
absolutely nothing out there, at the
macro level, that could dethrone the
Newtonian Mechanics and replace it
with, say, Einstein's General Theory of
Relativity (GTR), or with anything
else. Indeed, for instance, the two
major observational tests attributed to
support Einstein's GTR were
1)
one, with respect to
explaining the peculiar
perihelion precession of
Mercury's orbit, and
2)
the other, with respect to
predicting the deflection of
light by the Sun.

which,
both of them, can be explained
with ease from the principle
of Classical (Newtonian)
Physics and nothing
else.

1.
The fundamental error that exists in
Einstein's GTR, when dealing with the
perihelion precession of Mercury's
orbit, is that there, the Sun is being
considered to be a homogeneous
spherical mass which in reality it is
not. Today, we know that the Sun's mass
and distribution is far from being
homogeneous, being in fact of an
enormous complex structure that of a
hot nonhomogeneous plasma interwoven
with magnetic fields. To this, if we
add a recent observational finding and
recognition that the Sun is not quite
spherical, as its poles are flattened,
then we begin to appreciate that the
anomalies of Mercury's orbit are a
direct reflection of that physical
complex reality and nothing else. All
that was first recognized in April
1982, at the University of Arizona,
USA, by Professor Henry A. Hill in
collaboration with Dr. Philip A. Goode
and the graduate student Randall J. Bos
and, reported by Hill of those results
before the Royal Astronomical Society
of Dublin.
2.
The deflection of light by the Sun (or
by any other massive mass) is indeed a
straightforward consequence of Newton's
corpuscular theory of light coupled
with his (and not of Einstein) theory
of gravity and, nothing else. Again, in
the Sun's case, its complex structural
mass needs to be taken into account in
the calculation of the trajectory of
light's corpuscular deflection that
must exist in conformity with the
modified Newton's formula of
gravity.

Yes, as you perhaps may have guessed, it is the
aim of TRUTON not only to eliminate and
pulverize those two irrational implants
Quantum Mechanics and Relativity, but also to
restore and continue the long standing rational
path of Physics formalized by Isaac Newton and
its followers a path that may be called the
Trutonian path.
What
was wrong, one may ask, with Newton's method of
discovering "things" in Nature and, why
with his approach which was so adequate in so
many respects, we could not "descend" and "see"
the cause of existence of various phenomena that
govern Nature such as gravity or "see" the cause
of all other interactions that govern Nature's
particle world?
!


Well, it is
perhaps important to answer to that
here, and right now, that the primary
propositions or axioms which Newton has
chosen in building up his Theory Of
Nature (TON) were limited in two
(2) major areas:
i)
one,
that they were placed much too
"high up" in the evolutionary
ladder of Nature and thus,
from there no one could
"descend" below the base
platform of his axioms and
primary propositions;
and
ii)
the
other, that they were
primarily channeled concerning
the state of motion
through his famous
three (3) Laws (or
Axioms) of Motion
(enunciated in his
seminal Principia)
leaving aside the state
of matter the other
indispensable primary
ingredient of Nature as, first
perhaps, recognized by
Immanuel Kant in his
Cosmolgy
("Universal Natural History
and Theory Of
Heavens").

I. Kant

Now, as noted (in point i),
since from a given set of axioms, one
can go only upwards in a meaningful
way, the "level" of those axioms were
clearly far above the atomic and
subatomic world and hence, from that
starting point it was impossible to
tackle the world "below."
In
addition, as noted (in point
ii), because the state of
primal matter was left and set
aside by Newton, that made it quite
impossible, with Newton's
TON,
to tackle the material world "below"
that is ultimately responsible for
all material interactions that
govern Nature.
That
last recognition of the foundational
role of the
primal
matter
is truly monumental for TRUTON. Indeed,
here, in TRUTON, we shall begin our
journey from the absolute "bottomline"
level of matter from where there will
be no "below" or "underneath" to
consider. Then, from that absolute
"bottom" line of Nature, we shall,
exactly as in Mathematics, build up the
entire theory of Nature, our TRUTON.
Clearly, by building TRUTON from the
"bottom" up, we shall expect that some
(if not all) of Newton's axioms or laws
of motion to be incorporated and
integrated into the foundation of
TRUTON.

It
is also important to note that while Newton
clearly had indicated in Principia's
Preface (see the underlined text
above)
the reason why he chose the Euclidean
geometry as the mathematics
capable of describing the forces and phenomena
of Nature, Einstein and their followers and
those embracing the Quantum mechanics, never
ever were able to provide a justification for
their hocuspocus mathematics
employed except to say that with such departure
"it works!" [sic!] meaning that
we can write a lot of hocuspocus papers
containing a lot of beautiful
mathematics.
Finally,
let us note one more time that throughout the
entire history of Physics and for that matter of
the rest of Natural Sciences, the direction of
theoretical work was done, if you will,
"inwards":
we
started with the result (provided by
observations or experiments) and
went "inwards" attempting to find an
explanation for the result
obtained.

In
Mathematics, as we have noted, the
method of obtaining its results has
been exactly opposite being, if you
will, in the "outwards"
direction:

you
start with certain primary
propositions called axioms beyond
which there are no more meaningful
inquiries to be made and then, you
work your way "up" deriving results
which are build up from the previous
results and so on.

It
is this "outwards" direction from the
ground up that we shall attempt to
initiate as the new direction of
studying Nature called the
trutonian or the trutonic
method.

To travel with us in our
trutonian/trutonic
ascendent
journey,
you need not have any special mathematical
training because the principles of TRUTON can be
understood from reasoning derived from physical
considerations alone. The backbone of TRUTON is
causality. In TRUTON, causality is its
centerpiece. Describing Nature without its
physical casuality is not acceptable in TRUTON.
For example, in TRUTON taking and employing
gravity without knowing its cause and
origin of existence is not an acceptable form of
presentation. In other words, the descriptive
approach without causality in presenting Nature
is not the approach that TRUTON will embrace.
Because of that causality "skeleton" of TRUTON
that is physical and not mathematical in nature,
special mathematical training or skills are nor
required in here.
In
TRUTON, causality and origin of
phenomena will always be of a physical
nature, and never ever, be of a
mathematical one as in the
hocuspocus Quantum
Mechanics !


Finally,
the Mathematics that can be applied to
TRUTON's "skeleton" can give rise
indeed to a beautiful theoretical
"body" whose elegance and beauty only
Mathematics can provide. And, as
already noted,
the most suitable Mathematics for
TRUTON appears to be the
Tensor
Analysis
whose physical derivative is, as
noted,
the advanced
Continuum
Mechanics
(known also as the
Rational
Mechanics).
But
before one can dress TRUTON with
elegant garments provided by
Mathematics, we need first to know what
we are dressing up and, making sure
that this is the body that we want to
dress!

.