T R U T O N
by Kalman Klim Brattman
Give me the simplest form of matter and motion,
and I will construct, out of them, the world of Nature.
"Give me matter, and I will construct a world out of it."
Immanuel Kant, Kant's Cosmology
("Universal Natural History and Theory Of Heavens")
6. The Ultimate Physical Law of Nature: The Ergolevel Law
 

We are now at the threshold of discovering the physical laws of Nature (PLONs). A primordial set of rather formidable questions with respect to PLONs are facing us, such as:

!
PASS
WITH
UTMOST
CARE
  • WHY do PLONs have to exist in the first place? And,
  • DO they have a rationality for their existence?
  • WHY do PLONs have a particular form or characteristic and not another?
  • ARE the PLONs connected in any way with each other or DO they exist independently one from another?
  • DO the PLONs have a common origin and, if so, WHAT that common origin is? And,
  • DO they have a common rationality of their existence and, if so, WHAT that common rationality is?

  

Archimedes
Arguably, perhaps the oldest physical law of Nature (PLON) was formulated by Archimedes (c. 250 BC) who, in his treatise "On Floating Bodies," enunciated that

"Any object, whole or partially immersed in a fluid, is buoyed up by a force equal to the weight of the fluid displaced by the object." [underline supplied.]


That ancient PLON of Archimedes is far more profound that it appears to be, leading in TRUTON, as we are about to see, to the foundation of the
Ultimate Baselevel Law Of Nature (UBLON).

On the Underneath Substratum of the Archimedes Principle


That recognition of Archimedes, known as the Archimedes Principle of Buoyancy (APOB), is truly remarkable as from there it follows that the environmental fluid, and nothing else, is responsible for the behavioral characteristics of its immersed objects as some will be forced to float, others to sink, and still others to stay put. That monumental recognition springing from APOB that the fluid, and nothing else, is responsible for that unprecedented selection which objects must be forced to obey (that is to sink, to float or to stay put) is truly remarkable indeed. Continuing and following with that recognition, that would imply that a bridge of communication (BOC) must exist between the fluid and its immersed objects. WOW! But for that BOC to exist, a common denominator (CODE) must be present in order for that communication to take place! So then, we have come to ask
.What possible common denominator (CODE) could exist between the fluid, which is there assumed to be incomprehensible, and its objects?

Well, the answer for that CODE was first recognized by Archimedes himself to be the weight: the weight of the objects versus the weight of the displaced fluid generated by the immersed objects. The weight concept however is intimately connected with gravity which in TRUTON has not yet been introduced. As such, following the "weight" trail, we reach to the concept of mass as the quantity of matter.

From there, continuing on the same trail, we reach its end with the concept of density. And that is not too surprising to reach that end there because of the recognition expressed in the 5th UTPOT that density represents indeed the ultimate physical parameter of Nature.

In pursuing the trail of the Archimedes Principle Of Buoyancy (APOB), we have stumbled upon this truly monumental recognition vested in
The Sixth Foundational Universal Recognition Of Nature (6h FURON): 
The Generalized Archimedes Principle (GAP)

All inanimate material objects of Nature derive their behavioral properties from the relationship that they can establish with their environment. That relationship is the result of a bridge of communication (BOC) that can be established via a common denominator (CODE) that must exist between the environment and its objects.

If no such relationship can be established to exist between the objects and their environment, then no behavioral properties can exist for those objects. Objects that do not exhibit behavioral properties with respect to their environment are said to be inert modulo that environment.

Fundamental Remark: By GAP, it follows that the key in discovering the cause of behavioral properties of material objects is by deciphering the general relationship that they could establish with their environment.

The Fundamental Corollary (FUCO) of GAP

In an absolute vacuum environment, all imbedded inanimate material objects are devoid of all behavioral properties being thus inert modulo vacuum.

Proof:
.With the simple recognition that no common denominator (CODE) could possible exist between the absolute vacuum and a material object, the proof is complete as no bridge of communication (BOC) could possible be established between the environmental vacuum and its immersed objects.

QED.


With that gained insight of GAP, we are now facing a pivotal and inescapable question:
How the Generalized Archimedes Principle (GAP) will manifest its existence when the fluid in question is no longer incompressible, but is compressible, and vested in the TRUTON's xenofluid (XF) medium?
The answer to that question, as in the case of APOB, will emerge when we will be able to discover the common denominator (CODE) that must exist (by GAP) between the environmental xenofluid (eXF) and its immersed objects, and then,

 


B. Pascal
to discover how that communication will take place and thus discovering their bridge of communication (BOC).

BTW, In classical Fluid Dynamics, as we have recognized, the CODE that springs from the Archimedes Principle Of Buoyancy (APOB), is the density: the material density of the (displaced) fluid VS. that of its immersed objects. In there, the bridge of communication (BOC) is obtained from the Pascal's Law (after Blaise Pascal) of the fluid-pressure transmission.

Our posted question now therefore has transformed into finding out what CODE could exist between the environmental xenofluid (eXF) and its embedded objects. Is the density concept capable of leading us to the sought inquiry? --that is one question that now we want to examine.

 

On the Affinity of the Environmental Xenofluid With its Embedded Objects



SUBTLE
PASSAGES
AHEAD

  

PASS WITH
MUCH CARE
Continuing traveling on the density wagon, we now introduce the density level concept, called densilevel (deL), of a volume as being the quantity of matter that exists in that volume. In TRUTON, the baseline or the bottom line of Nature is considered to be the line furnished by the xenobase (XB) densilevel. As such, our posted question above can now be restated as follows:
?

How and Why the environmental xenofluid (eXF) medium of Nature will be forced to react towards the material objects that are "below" the densilevel of XB or "above" the one of eXF ?


Well, in the previous page, we have recognized that the xenofluid (XF) is a container of
ergoenergy (erE) whose arena of existence, the ergosea (erS), is ingrained into the xenofluid's fabric. The displaced xenofluid by its embedded objects will carry an amount of ergosubstance (ES) that can be compared with the ergosubstance (ES) of each individual embedded object when is viewed from the ergosea (erS). From that ergo-vista view, the material objects immersed into the xenofluid will become ergo-objects through an ergo-characteristic yet to be defined.

In the ergo-vista view, the densilevel (deL) concept transforms, for both the xenofluid and its immersed objects, into a corresponding ergolevel (erL) concept.

Thus, the common denominator (CODE) between the xenofluid (XF) and its immersed objects is no other than the ergoenergy (erE) that creates their respective ergolevels (erLs).


Now, we can talk about ergoholes (erHs) as objects or entities that have their ergolevel (erL) below that of their environmental xenofluid (eXF) medium and of ergopeaks (erPs) whose ergolevel (erL) are above that eXF-medium. The
bridge of communication (BOC) that is emerging in there is forcing now the xenofluid (XF), and not its immersed objects, to follow a particular ergoleveling behavioral pattern namely to run towards the ergoenergy holes --the ergoholes (erHs), and to run away from ergoenergy peaks --the ergopeaks (erPs).

That leveling process which the environmental xenofluid (eXF) is following, the ergoleveling introduced in the 5th FURON, has a force, called ergoforce (erF), whose magnitude is proportional to the ergolevel gradient, called ergogradient (erG), created. Thus, the magnitude of erF increases or decreases in proportion with the increase/decrease of the ergopeaks (erPs) or ergoholes (erHs) sizes.

It is important to recognize that both the ergoholes (erHs) and the ergopeaks (erPs) reside outside of the boundaries of the ergosea (erS), and, that the ergoleveling process in there has, as its objective, of bringing them into the boundaries of the ergosea (erS).



On Ergodynamics of the Ergosea

We call ergodynamics the study of the dynamics of the ergosea (erS) towards its embedded objects that are viewed as ergo-objects.


Ergolevel Law (ERGOL) the Ultimate Base Level Law Of Nature (UBLON)

Within a closed system, all its embedded objects, regardless of their particular ergolevel (erL), are being ergoleveled by the ergosea (erS) of the system's environmental xenofluid (eXF).

Objects whose ergolevel (erL) lie outside of the system's ergosea (erS), are being brought --through ergoleveling-- to the ergoline boundaries of the ergosea (erS) either at its bottom (vested in the ergoline of the xenobase) or at its top (vested in the ergoline of the eXF).

It is important to stress and recognize again that the ultimate objective of ERGOL is that of bringing all objects of Nature within the confinement of the ergosea (erS). The dynamics of that ultimate ergoleveling process of Nature, called ergodynamics, stands at the foundation of explaining Nature's ultimate characteristic.


 

How the ergopeaks (erPs) and the ergoholes (erHs) are being integrated into the ergosea (erS) is the question that ERGOL must provide the answer.
What is the ergodynamics of ERGOL?
Well, the answer that emerges is derived from the "reaction" of the environmental xenofluid (eXF): that of running away from ergopeaks (erPs) and towards the ergoholes (erHs) with a speed dictated by the corresponding ergoforce (erF). That is, as stated, the ergoleveling process introduced in the 5th FURON.
  The physical law of Nature (PLON) of that
ergoleveling process, called the Ergolevel Law (ERGOL), states that

the environmental xenofluid (eXF) will have the tendency to flow towards ergoholes (erHs) --the called DownFall (DOFA) Law vested in Situation A, and to flow away from ergopeaks (erPs) --the called Runaway (RUNA) Law vested in Situation B. Thus, we can talk about a target base ergoline of Nature --the ergo baseline that is the line that ERGOL aims to achieve.

The corresponding ergoforce (erF), in both situations A and B, is proportional to the magnitude of the ergogradient (erG) created by the immersed objects viewed as ergo-objects (erOs).

The DOFA and RUNA laws --the two sides of ERGOL represent indeed the primal veins of ergodynamics through which Nature is channeling its energy that fuels its development and evolution from Prena.


Thus, the picture that begins to emerge is as follws for the two described situations:

  • FOR SITUATION A (with ergoholes)
    The eXF by running towards
    ergoholes (erHs) will create a dense XF-mantle around them, called coverlon (COV), that will make their global ergolevel (erL) to increase. That ergoleveling process will stop when their global erL will reach the level of the xenobase (XB) that represents the "bottom" of the ergosea (erS).
    . An ergohole (erH) that, through DOFA, has acquired its coverlon (COV) is said to be saturated while the one that has lost it, through RENO, is said to be naked.
    . Two or more ergoholes (erHs) that become saturated at the same time are said to be equiphased. Ergoholes (erHs) that are not equiphased are said to be outphased.
    . All ergoholes (erHs) are pulsating objects oscillating between their naked and saturated states.
    .
  • FOR SITUATION B (with ergopeaks)
    For the ergopeaks (erPs), the eXF will run away, by RUNA, from them generating a xenobase (XB) buffer zone around them called bufferlon (BUFF). That ergoleveling process will stop when their global erL will reach the ergolevel (erL) of their environmental xenofluid (eXF) medium that represents the "surface" of the ergosea (erS).
    . All ergopeaks (erPs) are vibratory objects due the permanent vibration of their bufferlons (BUFFs) that confront in permanence the RENO of their environmental xenofluid (eXF) medium.


ADDITIONAL REMARKS: ON ERGODYNAMICS
It is important to stress again that the ergoleveling process is designed to bring all objects into the ergosea (erS). Once that happens, that ergoleveling resultant however is being confronted and disturbed by ERGOL and RENO of the environmental xenofluid (eXF) creating therefore a permanent to-and-fro zigzagging tit-for-tat dynamics.
We also should note that the environmental turbulence generated from the
zigzagging tit-for-tat dynamics of eXF has created the foundational background for the primeval evolution in Nature to emerge and take place as formulated in the 2nd UTPOT.

On the Recognition of RAP and the Mention of God

The Ergolevel Law (ERGOL) can be viewed as the Reverse Archimedes Principle (RAP). And that is because in the Archimedes Principle of Buoyancy (APOB) the immersed objects are the ones that are forced to subscribe to certain behavioral characteristics (such as to sink or to float) while in ERGOL the reverse is taking place: here the environment and not its immersed objects are subject to certain behavioral characteristics (such as to run away or towards its immersed ergo-objects).

The Ultimate Physical Law Of Nature (UPLON) is indeed the ERGOL out of which all physical laws of Nature (PLONs) must have their ultimate foundational existence.

Finally, for those who believe in the existence of an omnipresent God and implicitly of a God's logic, the ERGOL represents indeed that underlying "logic" upon which God "operates" and manifests its existence. The challenge of evolution, as we have noted, is to outmaneuver or overpower ERGOL, and thus to outsmart or outwit God's flattening influence!


On the Singular Ultimate Commonality in Nature


 The "objective of existence" concept, as already noted, is a most powerful "lens" through which we can "see" Nature and thus, discover and "see" the physical laws that are operating in Nature without knowing exactly how they are being accomplished, i.e., without knowing exactly their respective "machineries" or "schemes" involved!

Continuing to marvel about matter's ultimate objective of existence as formulated in the above 8th UTPOT, we come now to "see" and recognize these universal principles of Nature vested in

The Second Fundamental Universal Scholium of Nature (2nd FUSON):
The Common Primeval Singular Foundation of Nature

All formations of Nature are build out of one single common primeval foundation reflected in the matter's ultimate sole objective of existence.

Fundamental Remark to the 2nd FUSON: Without the existence of a singular underlying foundational denominator, no edifice in Nature can be build without collapsing. That is to recognize that no multiple underlying foundations could exist in Nature without the collapse of Nature itself.

The Third Fundamental Universal Scholium of Nature (3rd FUSON):
On the Existence of the Ultimate Physical Law of Nature

There must be one, and only one primeval law of Nature, called the ultimate baselevel law of Nature (UBLON), from where all other physical laws of Nature (PLONs) are being derived from.

Proof: That is because if more than one primeval ultimate law would have existed in Nature, then those primeval laws of Nature would each create in the same physical space different entities that could not be reconciled one with another assuring therefore a total self-destruction of formations in Nature.

The Fourth Fundamental Universal Scholium of Nature (4th FUSON):
The Rational Predictable Characteristic of Processes in Nature
The Isaac Newton Ultimate Doctrine: "Hypotheses non fingo"

All processes or phenomena in Nature have a rationale for their existence springing ultimately from one, and only one, single underlying objective of matter --the baseolution.
There are no willy-nilly capricious physical processes or phenomena in Nature.

Fundamental Remarks to the 4th FUSON: Newton's Ultimate Doctrine (NUD)
No willy-nilly so-called primeval Big-Bang cosmological event/explosion ever took place in Nature. No willy-nilly so-called primeval fundamental interactive forces, such as strong and weak interactions/forces, exist in Nature which, by the way, were introduced ad-hoc and out-of-the-blue to "explain" Nature's behavioral characteristics at its atomic level of existence.

In short, no willy-nilly speculations of any sort that lack rationality and predictability for their existence should be allowed to populate, permeate, and pollute our theories of Nature. We call this, Newton's Ultimate Doctrine (NUD).


.The biggest NUD offenders in this regard are Einstein's lunatic Special Theory of Relativity, Einstein's misguided General Theory of Relativity and, as well, the irrational hocus-pocus Quantum Mechanics --a hocus-pocus mathematical (and not physical) theory of the Absurd (TOTA).

The today's Quantum Mechanics is indeed par excellence a TOTA, being a Hocus-Pocus Irrational Mechanics clothed with pockets of seductive advanced arbitrary Mathematics capable of masking its repugnant hollow physical skeleton!


On the Origin, Characteristics, and Objective of the Physical Laws of Nature (PLONs)


All physical laws of Nature (PLONs) are driven by a common objective of existence. There are no arbitrary nor capricious PLONs as recognized in NUD.

And that common objective of PLONs, as stated, is fueled by matter's ultimate objective of existence of staying at its baselevel (BALE) state existence as formulated in the 8th UTPOT and stressed again in the 4th Scholium above. And that BALE state is being transmitted through a variety of PLONs which all are able to operate through the "ergo connection" that was created between the environmental medium and its embedded material objects. And that is possible because the material objects and their material environment are made from one and the same material --the xenosubstance (XS). Thus, we can talk about "ergo" bridges of communication (BOCs) between the objects and their environment as first noted in the previous page. Those "ergo BOCs" are the venues or the veins, if you will, through which all PLONs operate.

We mark that eye-opener recognition into

The Eleventh Universal Transcendental Principle Of TRUTON (11th UTPOT)
On the Origin, Characteristics and Objective of the Physical Laws of Nature

All physical laws of Nature (PLONs) have a rationale for their existence derived from matter's ultimate objective of existence --that is of residing at the baselevel existence that represents the lowest possible state of existence for a particular enclosure. All PLONs are therefore behavioral expressions of the relationship that the material objects can establish with their ergo environment towards establishing a common baselevel existence.

Definitions:
  
.1. We call a physical law of Nature (PLON), a law describing a physical behavioral property in a particular environmental medium (EM). A PLON, always is function of a particular EM. Formally, we can write this as PLON=PLON(EM).
  
.2. Two or more objects in the same environment obeying the same PLON are said to be qualitatively equivalent or equivalent modulo that PLON.
  
.3. Objects that do not obey the same PLON in a particular environmental medium (EM) are said to be qualitatively different or different modulo that PLON(EM) in reference to that EM.
Example: Let's take the PLON to be the classical Archimedes Principle of Buoyancy (APOB) and the material environmental medium (EM) to be the water. All objects that, say, float form a class of objects that are qualitatively equivalent or equivalent modulo the buoyancy law. Objects that do not float are said to be qualitatively different from the objects that do float.

Fundamental Reiterating Remarks:
.As already stressed, the significance of APOB is monumental indeed as it reveals, above everything else, that objects that are thrown into a container of liquid, say water, could behave quite differently: some will sink, others will float, and still others will stay put in the water. So the environment, in that case of the aquatic environment, dictates how its objects will behave i.e., what type of aquatic properties they will acquire.
.The recognition that a material environment dictates the behavioral properties of its objects is indeed most remarkable. Through APOB, we come to the profound realization that inanimate material objects do not possess per se inherent properties for their behaviour, but that their behavioral properties are the sole result of the relationship that their material environment can establish with them.

The role of a material environment, as a mediator, was constantly in the mind of Isaac Newton who, when pondering over the origin and the mechanism of gravity, noted that much in a letter to Richard Bentley:

"... that one body may act upon another at a distance through a vacuum, without the mediation of any thing else, by and through which their action and force may be conveyed from one to another, is to me so great an absurdity, that I believe no man, who has in philosophical matters a competent faculty of thinking, can ever fall into it."

Sir Isaac Newton's Principia, vol. II, University of California Press, 1966, p. 634.

Newton's insight and recognition, of the pivotal role that the material medium must have, as a mediator, in dictating how inanimate material objects interact one with another, is now being reformulated into
The Fifth Fundamental Universal Scholium of Nature (5th FUSON):
The Ergo Connector of Nature (ECON)

All material objects of Nature are interconnected through its material ergo environmental medium --the xenofluid medium.

Remarks:
.1. Because of ECON, Nature is said to have a connected state of existence.
.2. Because in Prena, its environmental medium is vacuum, its objects can no longer connect one with another. There in Prena, its objects are said to be disconnected, and as such, Prena is said to have a disconnected state of existencee.

Aristotle
and, when it is coupled with Aristotle's vehement rejection of a cosmic vacuum medium ("Natura Abhorret Vacuum") and, last but not least, with that of
Archimedes' recognition of the influence that the aquatic environment has in the behaviour of its objects --that leads us into formulating
The Sixth Fundamental Universal Scholium of Nature (6th FUSON):
The Aristotle-Newton-Archimedes Principle (ANAP)

All material objects of Nature are interconnected through its material ergo environmental medium --the xenofluid medium. All inanimate material objects, barring mechanical impulses, derive their properties of behavior and interaction from the relationship that they can establish with their ergo environment. If an ergo environmental medium is absent, no such properties will exist for those objects surrounded by void. Inanimate natural material objects do not possess, per se, any innate inherent physical properties of behavior or interaction.

Remark: By ANAP , it follows that the key in deciphering the behavioral interactional properties of material objects is by discovering the individual relationship that they could establish with their ergo environment. Thus, in particular, the individual relationships that objects are establishing with their environmental xenofluid (eXF) must lead us to the discovery of all material interactions. And that, is simply because there is no other venue available that could lead us there.

In order for such a relationship to exist between the eXF and its inanimate material objects, a common denominator (CODE) needs to exist through which a bridge of communication (BOC) can be established. Discovering those CODEs with their respective BOCs is our ticket in discovering Nature's modus operandi.


Additional Commentary on the Two Types of Physical Parameters in Nature:

.A differentiation needs to be made between the physical behavioral properties of an object and its physical characteristics (or its properties of characterization or still, its characteristic properties). This differentiation leads us to the two types of physical parameters that can exist in Nature: one, of behavior; the other of characterization.
.A physical characteristic (or property of characterization) of an object is a description of a physical parameter that it possess. Example of such physical characteristics describing an object could be its density, its size, or its temperature.

Since the physical laws of Nature describe the physical behavioral properties of the material objects of Nature, it follows that the 11th UTPOT can be formulated in terms of behavioral properties of objects as noted below:

.

The Fundamental Corollary (FUCO) to the 11th UTPOT:
On the Origin, Characteristics and Objective of
the Physical, Behavioral Properties of the Material Objects of Nature
All material inanimate objects of Nature derive their behavioral properties from the relationship that they establish with their "ergo" environmental medium. When an "ergo" medium is absent, the objects embedded in it lack of having any behavioral properties being inert. Material inanimate objects do not possess, per se, any inherent physical behavioral property of characterization. The environmental material medium, and nothing else, shapes the behavioral characteristics of its material objects of Nature through the "ergo connection" that was established.
Analytical Recapitulative Remark:
All interactions in Nature among the material objects of Nature are the result of their relationship that are being established with their "ergo" environment that acts as a catalyst, a facilitator, and a platform through which material objects can communicate among themselves via a bridge of communication (BOC) that is endowed with a common denominator (CODE) between the material objects and their "ergo" environment.

That CODE cannot be transmitted through or being embedded into the vacuum medium. A material object or entity surrounded by the vacuum medium cannot communicate in any way with its surroundings. Such an object or entity is said to be marooned. All parcels of Nature (PONs), for instance, are marooned entities. Objects "falling" into a hole of Nothingness (HON) are said to be marooned.


Additional Concluding Remarks:
1. There are no physical laws of Nature that could not be associated with the baseleveling law either as emerging from it or opposing it. And that is because all other physical laws of Nature (PLONs) have their embryonal seed in the direction towards or away from the baseleveling platform. In short, there is no law of Nature that can ignore or bypass the existence of the BALE law.
2. Baseleveling can be viewed as the grand global renormalization tendency in Nature.
3. All physical laws of Nature (PLONs) have a logic or rational for their existence that are triggered from the downward baseleveling tendency formulated in the 8th UTPOT. Thus, the reason of the existence of physical laws in Nature is not because of the existence of some Divine Creature forcing upon us those laws to exist, but it is because the laws of Nature are nothing else but the carriers of certain environmental reactions resulted from matter's baselevel objective of existence.
4. All physical laws of Nature (PLONs), with no exception, have their ultimate origin in the UBLON.
5. Knowing the rationality of matter's
objective of existence reflected in its downward baseleveling tendency, put us on guard on the necessity of existence of an opposite tendency through an agent whose objective of existence is to defeat baseleveling. And that is because without the existence of such an opposing agent to baseleveling, Nature --as a whole-- will collapse ending up into a complete frozen standstill.


!

Identifying the agent opposing ERGOL, inferred above, must be now our next priority. And that is because, before we begin the study inquiring INTO WHAT the embryonal Nature (eN) will transform and evolve into, we need first to elucidate what agents are at work for that transformation and evolution to take place. That pivotal study into WHY and HOW Nature must evolve from its embryonal stage is the subject that is now next in line to follow.

 

      

Kalman Klim Brattman