T R U T O N
The Rational Unified Theory Of Nature
by
Kalman
Klim Brattman
Give
me the simplest form
of matter and
motion,
and I will build,
out of them, the
world of Nature.
"Give
me matter, and I will construct
a world out of it."
Immanuel Kant,
Kant's Cosmology
("Universal Natural History and
Theory Of Heavens")
0.
Motivation:
Outlining
TRUTON and the Rationale for its
Existence
It is the purpose
and scope of this work to
establish the blueprint
for a rational foundation of
understanding Nature from one
single principle, law, cause, or
"logic" of operation. The method
employed here, never used before
in the form presented herein, is
modeled from the skeleton of
Mathematics (som+) where we start
with certain primary propositions,
called axioms, and then using
rational thinking --and only
rational deductive thinking-- an
entire bottom-up theory is
build up.
Unlike
in Mathematics (where
those axioms can be any
proposition that
cannot be derived from
anything else 
and
cannot lead to
rational contradictory
results), in TRUTON,
those primary
propositions, in
addition, must have
physical roots and
connotations that
cannot "offend" our
given common sense
(comsen). That
addition (+) in som is
essential indeed.
Our modeled som+ method of
discovering things in Nature,
should not be confused with the
long standing method of using
Mathematics as a tool in
deriving results. We will not
use Mathematics per se,
but instead we will use its method or the model of
Mathematics (mom) of how it
obtains its results and nothing
else.
TRUTON, at its
core, is par excellence, a
direct outgrow from Classical
Physics and its followers
initiated methodically by Galileo
Galilei and Sir Isaac Newton.
Isaac Newton
.
On
July 5, 1686, Sir Isaac
Newton published his
seminal and revolutionary work
entitled Philosophić
Naturalis Principia
Mathematica (Mathematical
Principles of Natural
Philosophy) or in short Principia.
The object of Principia was to
establish in a rational fashion
a "mechanical" Universe where
all motions studied to be able
to be derived from coherent
mathematical-mechanical
principles. It was Newton who first
coined the term Rational
Mechanics to distinguish it from
the study of Empiric Mechanics.
Newton, following into
the steps of Copernicus, Kepler,
Galileo Galilei, and many others
preceding them, saw clearly the
close and profound
interrelationship that existed
between Mathematics (in his
case, the Euclidean geometry)
and Mechanics and how one draws
from another their own
existence. In his Preface to the
First Edition of Principia, Newton noted
(Principia, vol. I, Univ. of
California Press, 1966, pp.
xvii-xviii):
"The
ancients considered mechanics
in a twofold respect; as
rational, which proceeds
accurately by demonstration,
and practical. To practical
mechanics all the manual arts
belong, from which mechanics
took its name. ... To describe
right lines and circles are
problems, but not geometrical
problems. The solutions to
these problems is required
from mechanics, and by
geometry the use of them, when
so solved, is shown; and it is
the glory of geometry that
from those few principles,
brought from without, it is
able to produce so many
things. Therefore
geometry is founded in
mechanical practice, and is
nothing but that part of
universal mechanics which
accurately proposes and
demonstrates the art of
measuring. But
since the manual arts are
chiefly employed in the moving
bodies, it happens that
geometry is commonly referred
to their magnitude, and
mechanics to their motion. In
this sense rational mechanics
will be the science of motions
resulting from any force
whatsoever, and of the forces
required to produce any
motions, accurately proposed
and demonstrated.
.... I
consider philosophy rather
than arts and write not
concerning manual but natural
powers, and consider chiefly
those things which relate to
gravity, levity, elastic
force, the resistance of
fluids, and the like forces,
whether attractive or
impulsive; and therefore I
offer this work as the
mechanical principles of
philosophy, for the whole
burden of philosophy seems to
consist in this --from
the phenomena of motions to
investigate the forces of
nature, and then
from these forces to
demonstrate the other
phenomena; and to this end the
general propositions in the
first and second Books are
directed. In the third Book I
give an example of this in the
explanation of the System of
the World; for by the
propositions mathematically
demonstrated in the former
Books, in the third I derive
from celestial phenomena the
forces of gravity which bodies
tend to the sun and the
several planets. Then from
these forces, by other
propositions which are also
mathematical, I deduce the
motions of planets, the
comets, the moon, and the
sea." [Underline and
underscore supplied.]
Then,
recognizing the limitation of
his work, Newton noted his
disappointment in his Preface to
Principia (ibidem) with a
glimpse at what future
theoretical work may be needed
to unlock the ultimate secrets
of Nature (underscore supplied):
"I
wish we could derive the rest
of the phenomena of Nature by
the same kind of reasoning
from mechanical principles, for
I am induced by many reasons
to suspect that they may all
depend upon certain forces
by which the particles of
bodies, by some cause
hitherto unknown, are either
mutually impelled towards
one another, and cohere in
regular figures, or are
repelled and recede from one
another. These
forces being unknown,
philosophers have hitherto
attempted the search of Nature
in vain; but I hope the
principles here laid down will
afford some light either to
this or some truer method of
philosophy."
And at the end
of his work, Newton clearly was
disappointed of not being able
to discover the deepest
interconnections that govern
Nature --from the origin of
gravity to the origin of other
forces, (ibidem, vol. II,
pp. 546-54), as he noted:
"Hitherto
we have explained the
phenomena of the heavens and
of our sea by the power of
gravity, but we have
not assigned the cause of
that power. This is certain,
that it must proceed from a
cause that penetrates to the
very centers of the sun and
planets, without suffering the
least diminution of its force;
that operates not according to
the quantity of the surfaces
of the particles upon which
acts (as mechanical causes
used to do), but according to
the quantity of solid matter
which they contain and
propagates its virtue on all
sides to immense distances,
decreasing always as the
inverse square of the
distance. ...
.But hitherto
I have not been able
to discover the cause of
those properties,
of gravity from phenomena, and
I frame no hypotheses; (In
the original Latin that become
famous, Hypotheses non
fingo)"
[Emphasis supplied.]
Because of that
impasse which continuously was
present and which was never been
able to be overpassed by all
generations that followed Newton, it was in the
end a path that was abandoned
altogether and replaced for the
first time with a novel path
containing elements of the
irrational with countless of
speculations over speculations.
Indeed, the
foundation of Newton's Mechanics
(dubbed today as Classical
Mechanics), and which reigned
supreme until the beginning of
the 20th century, was abandoned
and replaced first by Albert Einstein through a
so-called Relativistic mechanics
incorporating, in a novel
fashion, irrational thinking and
elements of the absurd, as
follows:
1)
first time, in 1905 with the
introduction of his so-called Special
Theory of Relativity
(where Newton's fundamental
concepts of Space, Time and
Simultaneity were being
challenged and mashed up
together into an absurd and
meaningless 4-dimensional
continuum called spacetime
where to the Euclidean
geometrical 3-dimensional Space,
Time was being added as the 4th
dimension of the newly created
imaginary Space. If t is
the Time variable, and x, y,
z are the geometrical
coordinates of a point, the
Euclidean Space
[x(t), y(t), z(t)] was
transformed into the meaningless
4-dimensional ad hoc
imaginary Space [x,
y, z, t]. And that ad
hoc absurdity is being
considered today as being a
revolution in viewing and
understanding Nature. [sic!]
2)
the second time, some 10-11
years later, with the
introduction of Einstein's so-called General
Theory of Relativity
purporting to be the theory of
gravity where the Space
itself,
Bernhard Riemann
called now the spacetime,
was postulated to have
out-of-the-blue a "curvature"
of some sort, of an unknown
origin, residing outside of
the structural realm
of Euclidean geometry.
Gravity was now being
"explained" through that
willy-nilly postulated
curvature of the spacetime. Now, the
3-dimensional structural
Euclidean geometry of Space
was replaced, willy-nilly,
with the higher-dimensional structural
geometry of the Riemannian
curved spaces purporting
to represent the true structural
physical Space of the
Universe (SOTU).
Once the gates
towards irrational were opened
and various structural
imaginary mathematical models
were introduced that had nothing
to do with the reality and the
physical world of Nature they
purported to represent, the
landscape of Physics has changed
in a most dramatic way. New
irrational implants were able
now to find a fertile ground for
development.
Asides from the
Relativity theories,
another unrelated irrational
non-Newtonian mechanics, called
Quantum Mechanics, that
could be renamed as A
Hocus-Pocus Phantasmal Mathematical
Theory Of the Absurd
(MathOA), was born out
of that "scientific" irrational
freedom pioneered by Einstein.
Indeed,
that Quantum
Mechanics theory was
founded on massive speculations,
aberrations of logic, lack of
common sense, and based on a
nonsensical spatial
structural foundation which were
wrapped up into beautiful and
elegant Mathematics that has had
no rational justification for
being associated with it, in the
description and the
representation of Nature. In
fact, Richard Feynman
--the 1965 Physics Nobel
Laureate was not joking when he
noted that:
Since the
rational thinking was no longer
a prerequisite in explaining
Nature in the new "modern"
Physics and, since the
irrational arguments were
gaining tacit acceptance more
and more through the pioneering
of Einstein's Relativistic
mechanics and followed by the
birth of a new novel mechanics
--the Quantum mechanics, a new
illogical speculative
"scientific" climate was able to
emerge with Physics at its
forefront followed closely by Cosmology
that subsequently spilled
further into Chemistry.
In the "new"
Physics, more than in any other
Natural Science, willy-nilly hocus-pocus
advanced Mathematics, with no an
iota of justification, began to
cover a vast amount of physical
speculations creating in the end
elaborate advanced mathematical
theories of entirely speculative
nature. Those speculative
results, in a way, became
seductive because of the beauty
of the language of Mathematics
that was able to describe them.
The Physics and
Cosmology part of TRUTON,
of course, can
considerably be
enhanced and
beautified with
expressing those
results in the
beautiful language
provided by
Mathematics as
outlined in here
below:
If TRUTON
is designed to be
the exclusive theory
of Nature, then that
representation must
be independent of
our sense
perceptions and, in
particular, to be
able to make sense
for born blind
people! How we, the
humans, see and
perceive our
environment, as
interesting as it
may be, is not part
of a true rational
theory of Nature (ratton).
The
Theory of Sense
Perception
(TOSP) as
interesting as it
may be, lies
outside of the
realm of Physics
as its results
need not depend of
how the humans or
other livings
perceive their
surroundings in
various conditions
or circumstances.
For instance, at best, Einstein's Special Theory of Relativity, is par excellence,
a theory of
sense
perception (TOSP)
and thus, it
needs to
reside outside
of the realm
of Physics!
In
TRUTON all
forces and
concepts of Nature
are real and not
fictional and, its
results should
never ever be
derived from our sense
perceptions
(senpers) of
how we see or
perceive certain
physical phenomena
from different
systems of
references or
systems of
coordinate or
other particular
conditions.
Based on the
fundamental
principle of TRUTON,
that all its
results must be
independent from
any particular
coordinate system,
the question that
arises is what
model would be
acceptable in here
and what
Mathematics should
be used.
Well,
the Mathematics
employed in Continuum
Mechanics
(known also as The
Rational
Mechanics)
is the
mathematical model
most suited for TRUTON
where the Tensor
Calculus
(and Tensor
Analysis, in
general)
represents its
mathematical
backbone since a
tensor in
Mathematics has an
existence
independent of any
particular
coordinate system.
Physical
laws when
expressed, as in Continuum
Mechanics,
by tensor
equations
are universal in
the sense that if
they are valid in
one coordinate
system, then they
are valid in any
other coordinate
system. That
beauty of
invariance of
tensor equations,
regardless of the
coordinate system
employed, makes
that tensor
approach universal
in a theory of
Nature.
As such,
The mathematical
blueprint and formalization of TRUTON for its Physics and
Cosmology
parts must be
the one vested
in the tensorial approach as it is currently employed in the advanced Continuum Mechanics cemented
by the late
Johns Hopkins
University
professor
Clifford
Truesdell and
his disciples
(most notably
by his
student, the
late Carnegie
Mellon
University
professor
Walter Noll).
C. Truesdell
As the
irrational method of
"explaining" things has
gradually entered into the
mainstream theories of Nature,
creating the body of The
Irrational Physical Theory Of
Nature (TIPTON), it was
not long before cosmologists
began entertaining
out-of-the-blue speculative
concepts as the invisible
dark matter, dark energy, black
holes, and so on, as being
"ingredients" of our Universe. A
glimpse into how in TRUTON
those speculative dark matter
and dark energy concepts are
being treated is provided below:
In TRUTON, as
we shall see, the
speculative concept
of dark
matter is
going to get a new
face-lift, as we
will discover the
existence of the elusive
particles (ELPAs)
whose surfaces are
made of the same
material as their
environmental
medium.
Those
ELPAs
will give rise
to the concept of an
elusive matter
(elma) whose
existence is being
exposed in here.
that
never
happened
The Universe
itself, nowadays is being
speculated as being originated
somehow from a point of infinite
density and temperature that
somehow began expanding and
continue to expand. Such a
postulated origin of the
Universe defies all logic, all
common sense, and most
importantly all Physics --as
Physics (as oppose to
Mathematics) does not allow
infinite parameters into its
arsenal. All physical parameters
of Nature are finite indeed.
Troubling
questions, that could have
triggered an alarm, such as how
a point of infinite density and
temperature could have been
formed in the first place, that
is in a blatant defiance to all
Physics and its concepts of
describing Nature, did not stop
the Big-Bang Cosmology
to became the dominant cosmology
of nowadays. God, if
there is one, surely is having a
field day in seeing how far off
the current physical science has
deviated from the rational
understanding of the Universe's
actual origin, formation and
evolution.
For
an analysis (outside
of TRUTON)
refuting the Big
Bang Cosmology,
see Paul
Marmet's
paper
"Big
Bang Cosmology
Meets an
Astronomical
Death"
<https:newtonphysics.on.ca/bigbang/index.html>
With this being
said, before going any further,
we may want to provide a glimpse
into TRUTON's own
cosmological model as follows:
Nature's
Ultimate Cycles
In
TRUTON, the
willy-nilly
lunatic Big-Bang
cosmological model
is being replaced
with the
cosmological model
based on the ultimate
grand everlasting
cycles (UGECs) of
Nature's spinning
megastructures --the
spinoverses
(SPIVs) that
are being formed
through various collisions,
with our Universe
being one such SPIV.
A
breaking
spinoverse
surrounded by
absolute
vacuum.
.Those
spinoverses
(SPIVs),
whose spin, by collisions,
can only increase
with time (because
their axes
of spin --AOS
are not fixed and
thus can rotate
freely in space
and, as such, an AOS
rotation of an 180
degrees will
result in a change
in the spin's
direction), will
ultimately reach a
finite
critical upper
limit of spin's
magnitude. A spinoverse
(SPIV)
reaching that spin
limit of rotation
will break up with
its remnant parts
flying apart
radially.
.Those
remnant flying
parts in the
surrounding vacuum
will decompress
and transform
themselves into
stable base level
entities, to be
identified later,
that now continue
with their radial
gliding linear
motions. They now
have became the
seeds for the
creation (through
collisions and
accretions with
other remnant
parts of other
disintegrative
spinoverses)
of new
spinning
megastructures,
i.e., of new
spinoverses
(SPIVs).
.The
spinoverse
cycles of
formation and
self-destruction
--the UGECs
are able thus to
exist in
perpetuity. Thus,
Nature does not
have a beginning
nor an end of
existence --being,
as such, a given
eternal entity, as
oppose to its spinoverses
(aka, its universes)
that all possess a
finite life of
existence with a
beginning and an
end, being thus
entities derived
all from the
eternal Nature.
While Nature is
unlimited both in
its existence and
dimension, its
created spinoverses
(aka, its universes)
are not: they are
all limited in
their existence
and extent.
Moving
on, we now note that the novelty
of the new "modern" Physics is
vested in its ability to place,
side by side, the irrational
with the rational and mash up
them together,
indistinguishably, through an
advanced mathematical format
that looks very "scientific" at
a very high level. As long as
that "modern" setting is allowed
to exist, peppered with elements
of the irrational and limitless
speculations, Natural Sciences
are indeed at a very great
peril. A beautiful seductive
Mathematics should never ever be
allowed to replace, or to be a
camouflage for, the missing
Physics in deciphering the
secrets of Nature. And that is
because an "arbitrary"
Mathematics can be associated
easily with concepts and
assumptions that have nothing,
but absolutely nothing, in
common with the reality
of Nature and its modus
operandi.
The flood of
speculations, that continued
unabated in the "new" Physics,
have proliferated sadly into all
Natural Sciences. From the many
examples that could be given, we
could mention for instance the
ludicrous speculation
responsible for the mass
extinction of the dinosaur some
65 million years ago as a result
of some catastrophic cosmic
event generated by the collision
of our planet with some real or
imaginary meteor.
[As
we shall see, the
mass extinction of
the dinosaur with
ease can be
explained through rational
arguments
--not as an
accident, but as a
necessity-- derived
from Evolutionary
Biology.
Unfortunately,
using the same
rational arguments,
we get the same
inescapable foregone
conclusion that a
mass extinction is
in order for the
human species, for
other certain
species of
terrestrial animals
and birds, as well
as, for some other
forms of terrestrial
life.
That
futuristic mass
extinction process,
that now has entered
into its
"strangulation"
phase, is currently
advancing at an
alarming accelerated
pace!
More on that, and
other related
subjects are posted
in our Evolutionary
Biology (EB)
section.]
The new "modern"
field of speculations over
speculations has created indeed
an extremely fertile terrain for
writing "scientific" speculative
papers and books --all masked
under the elegant costumes of
advanced Mathematics that it was
employed with not one iota of
justification for its use.
Charos
Club
Everybody
appeared to be happy
of the newly found
bottomless
speculative
reservoir: the
universities and
other research
institutions were
delighted of the new
found wealth of
papers and books
that their members
were able to produce
as that wealth was
able to justify to
the society (which
has been footing the
bill) of the
necessity of
continuing with the
ever increasing
funding. They become
the "modern" charlatans
of science
(charos),
whose Club --the Charos
Club (CC) dominates
now the current
academic landscape
of Physics.
Charlatans Of
Science
(Charos)
.
C A R
T E L
.
Similar to a "Mafia"
Club, the "capos"
of the created Charos Club (CC) devised a protective
shield (prosh) from its
visibility to the rest of the
society, most difficult to be
recognized much less to be
penetrated, vested in an
advanced gibberish
mathematical shield (Gibmash),
and posted prominently at its
entrance. That Gibmash, designed to
cover the Club's nonsensical
theories of Nature, is posted
for camouflage and intimidation
purposes to be viewed by all
passing students and other
novice visitors at large.
or
This
new breed of
scientists (called
the gibbers
or the shammers)
of the created Gibberish
(Gibb) or Sham
Physics are
now encroaching the
entire landscape of
Physics. My
goodness, what a
science travesty of
an unimaginable
twist we are
witnessing and
witnessed for the
past 100 years...
Isaac
Newton and his
followers would have
rolled over their
grave to have seen
how degenerated the
new Physics has
became being totally
disfigured by the
massive peppering
with irrational
out-of-blue
speculations over
speculations covered
with high-end
Mathematics, to look
scientific, and
difficult to be
discerned...
Big-Bang theory of the Universe, Einstein's Relativity
theories,
spacetime
continuum,
Time
dilation/contaction,
Quantum
Standard
Model, Quantum
gravity,
Quarks/Antiquarks, muon, tau, and other elementary
particles
(leptons,
antileptons,
gouge bosons,
Higgs bosons,
gluons, and
many more),
dark
matter, dark
energy and so
on, are all
irrational
speculative
concepts
introduced ad
hoc to
"explain"
Nature considered
to be an absurd entity to begin with, for crying out
loud!
Gibb-Physics
or
Sham-Physics
Arguably,
today's Charos
Club (CC) can be viewed as
some sort of a science
masquerade cartel (SMC)
that, for Particle Physics,
could very well be called the TAU TAU
Quantum Cartel (taken from
the bogus tau particle
of Quantum Machanics).
The
most common and
visible protective
shield (prosh),
that is being posted
by the Charos
Club (CC)
towards the
novice visitors
entering its premises,
is the permanent
posting at its
"entrance" --for
intimidation
purposes--
typically in the
form of a
blackboard, some
advanced gibberish
mathematics
(gibmath)
that no outsider
could possibly
grasp, as
illustrated herein
by that of the
popular peddler for
the "new"
particle Physics
(NPP), Brian
Greene of
Columbia University,
USA (posted below) or
by that of the much
cited Lisa
Randall of
Harvard University,
USA (posted in here).
With that intimidating gibmath permanent
posting, the Gibmash
set-up is complete
being indeed
foolproof !
Brian Greene
Brian
Greene's
sample of
a typical
set-up
"shield"
placed in
front of the
visiting
novice
newcomers...
The mandatory
Ricci
tensor
(renamed in
Physics as the
Einstein
tensor)
is well
embedded
in there...
Today,
Physics
without
Einstein is
like having
Religion
without God...
BTW,
All
members of the Charos
Club (CC),
with
no exception,
appear to have one
basic commonality:
they
all appear indeed
to be very
manipulative and
quite dishonest
leading to
creating total indoctrination.
And,
that indocrination,
particularly for
the newcomer
students
(newstuds),
begins via a
"reeducation"
program of
controlling the
Mind's inferences
by injecting in it
an
amalgam
of
speculative,
illusionary,
circular and
irrational
reasoning mushed
up together with
aberrations of
logic and
distorted
unrelated
analogies reaching
the level of the
absurd!
(That nonsensical mushed amalgam, as noted, is being
infused with
some gibberish
incomprehensible
advanced
mathematics to
appear to the
novice as
being highly
scientific in
nature. The
end result of
all that is
the
incorporation
of high-level
gibberish, nonsensical, incoherent talk that appears to be a trademark, most notable, for
the elite
luminary
members of CC.)
If
someone from the TAU TAU
Quantum Cartel
is being accused
or challenged with
propagating irrationality,
then that is
simply explained
by declaring that
the
Mind
itself
is just obeying
the laws of Quantum
Physics
revealing, as
such, the "absurdity"
of Nature [sic!]...
.
.Arguably,
the
indoctrination
taking place
in the Particle Physics (PP) Cult is no different, in essance, than that of a Holy Religious (HR) Cult. And that is because at their substratum, they both
have one
common
denominator: their Irrationality.
The
indoctrinated
members of a PP Cult
and the ones
of a HR Cult
appear indeed
to look and
act quite the
same (pictures
below)...
There
are a number of
ways to be
successful in
indoctrination.
A
glimpse into the
manipulative
method of
indoctrination is
outlined below.
PS> Very often that false reality
is amplified
by the media
which is
sucked in by
the science
bait
-announcements.
.
Indoctrinated
by a HR
Cult.
Indoctrinated at CERN by a PP Cult.
In
the search of
the eternal
and elusive
"truth":
No
one from
either Cult,
under the
mantra of
"reaching the
truth,”
has any
idea what they
are actually
acclaiming or
praising.
As
in the case of "Mafia's
soldiers," the work of those
nowadays scientists appears to
be legitimate through the
cultivation of illusions which
have not an iota of rationality
in them and which, are being
trumpeted to represent the
course of the new, modern
Physics.
To quote again Richard Feynman, the reason the
new Physics had to take a turn
towards the Absurd was because
Nature itself happens to be absurd" [sic!]:
"Quantum
mechanics describe
Nature as absurd
from the point of
view of common
sense.
And yet it fully
agrees with the
experiment.
So, I hope you can
accept Nature as
She is --absurd."
[sic!]
From
Richard
Feynman's book
"The Strange
Theory of Light
and Matter,"
Princeton
University Press,
1988, p. 10:
Sorry,
the only thing
that is being
accepted in TRUTON
as being
absurd
is that Quantum Mechanics is par excellence a Theory of the Absurd...
And, we indeed, subscribe to the characterization of the
Oxford
Emeritus
Physics
Professor, Sir
Roger Penrose FRS who was quoted as saying:
"Quantum
mechanics
makes
absolutely no
sense."
Roger
Penrose
A
criticism of
Quantum
Mechanics,
outside of
TRUTON, is
provided in
Paul Marmet's
book:
"Absurdities
in Modern
Physics: A
Solution"
(1993)
<https:newtonphysics.on.ca/heisenberg/chapter1.html>
The author is
the late
Assistant
Physics
Professor of
the University
of Ottawa.
<https:newtonphysics.on.ca/info/author.html>
As such, that new Physics Of
The Absurd (POTA), covered
by an impenetrable mantle
provided by an advanced ad-hoc
gibberish Mathematics, is being
peddled to the society at large,
as serving to the advancement
and/or the interests of Natural
Sciences and thus, as serving to
the society at large.
The reality of POTA however is
sadly different:
Speculative,
irrational work,
wrapped in fancy
advanced arbitrary
Mathematics, is
perhaps great for
its "academic"
glorification, but
it has no place
whatsoever into the
body or development
of Natural Sciences,
in general, and of
Physics, in
particular. The
plague of that
massive irrational
speculative work
that now has
engulfed the entire
"modern" Physics
needs to be
eradicated in its
totality if Physics
and thus Natural
Sciences can truly
be further advanced.
The
indoctrination of
the new students in
Physics with POTA has
been essential for POTA's
survivability. It
has been articulated
as follows by the
noted renown Physics
Nobel Laureate Richard Feynman:
It
is time long overdue
to begin cleaning
our house and
dispose of POTA
--that cumulated
academic garbage
entity and
remembering Max
Planck's
poignant words:
"Science advances one funeral at a time."
We make no mistake
on the urgency of
the cleaning and
disposal of that POTA's
foundation !
A
Grave LIGO conCERN
big-time
science con
artists of the
"new"
Physics...
How
more absurd or
repugnant this
picture from
CERN could be?
Bottles
of champagne
and hard
liquor are
part of CERN's
Control Room
decor!
Fabricated
milestones are
celebrated
there with
bottles of
champagne that
are labeled
accordingly.
Handy perhaps,
for
celebrating
fabricated
staged
discoveries or
for being able
to see what
one want to
see...
But not to
worry, the
society at
large is
footing the
bill for all
that massive
orchestrated
charade and
charlatanry!
Nothing, but
absolutely
nothing, has
advanced our
understanding
of the atomic
and subatomic
worlds from
the CERN,
FERMILAB or
LIGO experiments.
The
experimental part
of the "new"
Physics that
currently exists
- [be
it for
instance, at CERN
(say,
with the much
publicized
discovery of
the fictional
elusive
particle
purporting to
be responsible
for the
"origin of
mass" [sic!]
of subatomic
particles (whatever
that
nonsensical
endeavor is
presumed to be)
i.e.,
of the
discovery of
the so-called
speculative Higgs
boson),
- or
at FERMILAB,
- or at the LIGO Labs (with the purported discovery of
the Cosmic
Gravitational
Wave which
is a
monumental
costly
orchestrated
hoax),
- or
at any other
multi-million/billion
dollar project
of the "new"
experimental
Physics/Astronomy,
such as the
$10 billion James
Webb Space
Telescope
of ZERO
scientific
value by
detecting a
number of
previously
unknown
galaxies out
of the
millions still
undetected.
For more
detail of the
worthlessness
of that costly
astronomical
project click
in here.]
A costly
Webb Telescope image.
is made up of
mostly fabricated
imaginary
"discoveries"
providing, at
best, pseudoscience
results (which
never ever needs
to be confused
with the real
science) and, at
worst, fraudulent
results gained
from plain deceit.
The
bogus
experimental
data received
from the "new"
experimental
Physics is no
accident and,
that is because
the theory
behind that
data, which is
always
preconceived, is
flawed at its
very foundation.
Indeed, the
foundation of
Quantum
Mechanics, the
foundation of Einstein's
theory of
gravity, of
space and time,
of Relativity, the
speculative out-of-the-blue
foundation of
the Big-Bang
cosmological
theory or of the
speculative
existence of
Black Holes
--all are flawed
foundations out
of which we can
get only flawed
preconceived
results. All
those
willy-nilly
foundations and
representations
do no exist in
Nature, but only
exist in a
deformed speculative
imagination of
Nature that a
Mind can phantom
to exist.
The April 2019
frenzy,
triggered from
the consensus
of a group of
astronomers'
pronouncement
of being able
to capture the
first image of
a purported Black Hole, is the latest fabricated example of a spectacular hoax
that has being
promulgated
worldwide.
Natural Sciences in
general, and
Astronomy and
Physics in
particular,
are indeed in
great peril
with the
proliferation
of the
speculative
concocted hoaxes
that now
pollute the
purity of
science, at
its very core
of existence.
Out of those hoaxes,
a new type of
"science" is
in the making:
the hoaxology.
The purported Black Hole is nothing but a cosmic Black Hoax that belongs into the realm of hoaxology!
Black Holes do not exist in Nature, they only exist in our
deformed
imagination of
Nature whose
theoretical
foundation was
derived from Einstein's lunatic theory of Space and Time with its
nonsensical spacetime concept of General Relativity.
The picture
purporting to
be a Black Hole is not in fact an actual physical picture (i.e., is
not a
"photo"), but
is the
simulated
image obtained
from a
computer
imaging
algoritm that
generates
petabytes of
radio
telescope data
on a general
relativistic
model.
Thus,
the claim that
the
computerized Black Hole image obtained represents another proof of
confirming the
validity of Einstein's General Relativity is fallacious as it is based on
circular
reasoning or
circular
logic.
Indeed, that orchestrated cosmic hoax started with creating an algorithm based on the
existence of Einstein's General Relativity and ended up with a simulated
computerized
image
purported to
confirm the
validity of
that spacetime relativistic theory of Einstein
[sic!].
As such,
the circular
argument is
complete: we
ended up where
we started!
The components
of a circular
argument are
logically
valid because
if the premise
is true, the
conclusion is
also true!
A
purported
Black Hole
From particle
accelerations or
colliders, we
never ever could
gain anything that
could advance our
understanding of
the nano-world of
Nature. And that,
as we shall see in
the next
section,
is because of
Heisenberg's Observational
Indeterminacy
Principle
(HOIP)
dubbed today,
incorrectly, as Heisenberg's
principle of the
"observer
uncertainty
effect."
[Originally, Heisenberg used the word "ungenauigkeit" ("indeterminacy")
to describe
his
observational-impasse
recognition
that in the
English-language
version,
incorrectly,
was translated
as "uncertainty"
and which,
later, was
transformed
into a new and
different form
and type of "observer uncertainty effect" known today as Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle (HUP).]
.
Life is good
at FermiLab...
From the
speculative
cosmological
Big-Bang
phenomenon or the
purported
imaginary Black
Holes that do not
exist in Nature,
but exist only in
our own twisted
imagination, we
can make elaborate
and costly
experiments (such
as the ones from CERN,
FERMILAB,
or LIGO
Labs)
and claim, in the
end, to be a
confirmation of
whatever the
sought result we
want to get.
However, to dupe
the society which
is footing the
bill of billions
and billions of
dollars in the
name of "science"
for those
speculative
mega-projects that
lack an iota of
rationality in
them, is indeed
criminal and
repugnant to the
core of our entire
civilization --and
that, cannot go
on, and on,
unabated.
That global academic science
masquerade cartel (SMC), that has been
in existence for quite some
time, cannot go on and on
indefinitely. There should be a
time when that wide spread
academic charade, upon exposure,
will have to come to an end.
Abraham
Lincoln
As such, and in response to
SMC, at our
"trutonian" door, for the
adherent members of the
introduced Particle
Physics (PP) Cult, we have placed
this posting paraphrased from
the one coined some two
centuries ago by Abraham
Lincoln, the 16th President of
the United States:
"You
can fool
some of the
people some
of the time,
you
can
even fool some
of the people all
the time,
but
you cannot fool
all the
people all
the time."
A
End
of conCERN
Moving on, from
Particle Physics, the bottom-end
frontier of Physics --the mother
of all Natural Sciences, there
is absolutely no evidence that
our understanding of Nature has
been enhanced at all, neither
with the advent of a) Quantum
Mechanics nor with that of b) Einstein's Relativity
theories. Indeed,
!
a)
Basic, fundamental
questions expected
to be elucidated in
Quantum Mechanics
are to this day
completely ignored
and left literally
in the dark... For
instance, upon the
discovery of the
Electron and the
Proton, to this very
day, there is no
understanding as to
WHY the Electron and
the Proton have
electric charges in
the first place, nor
is there an
understanding as to
WHY those respective
charges are exactly
equal in magnitude.
.Also,
there is no existing
explanation as to
WHY the negative
charge is being
associated to the
Electron --as a
negative quantity
usually represents a
deficit of some
sort, nor is there a
rationality as to
WHY to the Proton it
was associated a
positive charge --as
a positive quantity
is usually
associated to a
surplus of some
sort.
In fact, those arbitrary ad-hoc charges
attributed to
the Electron
and Proton
happen to be
the correct
ones. A crude
explanation as
to WHY that is
so, is
provided
succinctly
below:
.The
Electron's
core, as
we shall see,
is a permanent
energy
"peak."
Its created permanent
surrounding charge,
as we shall
see, is
lowering the
electron's
global energy
level to the
level of its
surrounding
environment
and, as such,
is being
represented as
a negative
charge.
.The
Proton's
core, on
the other
hand, as we
shall see
again, is a permanent
energy
"hole"
that intermittently
is able
to acquire a charge
capable intermittently
to elevate its
energy level
to reach the
bottom energy
level of its
environment.
Because of
that elevating
capability of
that acquired
charge, we
associate to
it the positive
sign.
With the
recognition
that the Proton
is a permanent
energy "hole,"
the
explanation of
Newton's
ordinary gravity
is, as we
shall see,
rather
straightforward!
.
M.
Planck
Asides from generating the gravitational field,
as we also
shall see, the
Proton
intermittently
emanates a radiant
energy
cementing thus
Max
Planck's
monumental
recognition
that the energy
radiation
is not
continuous,
but is
"punctuated"
through "packets"
of energy
that
eventually
become to be
called as "quanta"
of energy.
Continuing
with the state of
the current Physics,
WHAT an electric
charge actually is,
besides being a
"property" of
matter?, or
HOW and WHERE those
particles store and
carry their
respective electric
charges? --are
examples of some
basic fundamental
questions that today
are not even being
asked, much less
entertained, in that
truly repugnant
Quantum Mechanics.
No
Mathematics indeed
can fill up or mask
that void of
knowledge! The naked
ignorance is there,
in plain sight, as
no mathematical
shield is able to be
found in Quantum
Mechanics to cover
that profound gap of
knowledge, from the
many, that currently
exist.
!
FESTINA
LENTE
("HURRY SLOWLY")
.
b)
Contrary to the
current existing
prevailing view,
there is nothing,
but absolutely
nothing out there,
at the macro level,
that could dethrone
the Newtonian
Mechanics and
replace it with,
say, Einstein's
General Theory of
Relativity (GTR), or
with anything else.
Indeed, for
instance, the two
major observational
tests attributed to
support Einstein's GTR
were
1) one, with respect to
explaining the
peculiar
perihelion
precession of
Mercury's
orbit, and
2) the
other, with
respect to
predicting the
deflection of
light
by the Sun
which,
as to be seen, can be explained with ease from the
principle of Classical
Physics
developed in TRUTON
and nothing
else.
1'.
The fundamental
error that exists in
Einstein's
GTR, when dealing
with the perihelion
precession of
Mercury's orbit, is
that there, the Sun is
being considered to
be a homogeneous
spherical mass which
in reality it is
not.
Today, we
know that the Sun's
mass and
distribution is far
from being
homogeneous, being
in fact of an
enormous complex
structure --that of
a hot
non-homogeneous
plasma interwoven
with magnetic
fields. To this, if
we add a recent
observational
finding and
recognition that the
Sun is not quite
spherical, as its
poles are flattened,
then we begin to
appreciate that the
anomalies of
Mercury's orbit are
a direct reflection
of that physical
complex reality of
the Sun, and nothing
else.
All that was first
recognized in April
1982, at
the University of
Arizona, USA, by Professor
Henry A. Hill in
collaboration with Dr.
Philip R. Goode
and the graduate
student Randall
J. Bos and,
reported by Hill of
those results before
the Royal
Astronomical Society
of Dublin. (See
also this
referenced article.)
2'.
The deflection of light by
the Sun (or
by any other massive
mass) is being
explained not out of
Einstein's
lunatic spacetime
theory of gravity,
but is explained herein
from TRUTON's
theory of gravity
derived from the
principles of Classical
Physics.
Yes, as you
perhaps may have guessed, it is
the aim of TRUTON not
only to eliminate and pulverize
those two irrational implants --Quantum
Mechanics and Relativity, but also to
restore and continue the long
standing rational path of
Physics formalized by Isaac Newton and its
followers.
What was wrong,
one may ask, with Newton's method of
discovering "things" in Nature
and, why with his
approach which was so adequate
in so many respects, we could
not "descend" and "see" the
cause of existence of various
phenomena that govern Nature
such as gravity or "see" the
cause of all other interactions
that govern Nature's particle
world?
!
Well, it is perhaps important to answer to that,
right here and right
now, with noting
that the primary
propositions or
axioms which Newton has
chosen in building
up his rational
theory of Nature (ratton)
were limited in two
(2) major areas:
i)
one, that they were placed much too "high up" in the
evolutionary
ladder of
Nature and
thus, from
there no one
could
"descend"
below the base
platform of
his axioms and
primary
propositions;
and
ii) the
other, that
they were
primarily
channeled
concerning the
state of
motion
through his
famous
three (3)
Laws (or
Axioms) of
Motion (enunciated
in his seminal
Principia) leaving aside the state of matter
--the other
indispensable
primary
ingredient of
Nature as,
first perhaps,
recognized by
Immanuel
Kant in
his Cosmolgy
("Universal
Natural
History and
Theory Of
Heavens").
I. Kant
Now, as noted (in
point i),
since from a given
set of axioms, one
can go only upwards
in a meaningful way,
the "level" of those
axioms were clearly
far above the atomic
and subatomic world
and hence, from that
starting point it
was impossible to
tackle the world
"below."
In
addition, as noted
(in point ii),
because the state of
primal matter
was left and set
aside by Newton,
that made it quite
impossible, with Newton's ratton, to
tackle the material
world "below" that
is ultimately
responsible for all
material
interactions that
govern Nature.
That
last recognition of
the foundational
role of the primal
matter and
primal motion
is truly pivotal for
TRUTON.
Indeed, here, in TRUTON,
we shall begin our
journey from the
absolute
"bottom-line" level
of matter
and
motion (mamo)
from where there
will be no "below"
or "underneath" to
consider. Then, from
that absolute
"bottom" line of
Nature, we shall,
exactly as in
Mathematics, build
up the entire theory
of Nature, our TRUTON.
Clearly, by building
TRUTON from
the "bottom" up, we
shall expect that
some (if not all) of
Newton's
axioms or laws of
motion to be
incorporated and
integrated into the
foundation of TRUTON.
It is also
important to note that while Newton clearly had
indicated in Principia's
Preface (see the underlined text
above) the reason
why he chose the Euclidean
geometry as the Mathematics
capable of describing the forces
and phenomena of Nature, in the
new "modern" Physics the
justification for abandoning the
Euclidean
space is no longer
present.
Indeed,
Einstein and
their followers and
those embracing the
Quantum mechanics,
never ever were able
to provide a
justification for
their ad hoc
"arbitrary"
Mathematics
employed except to
say that with such
departure "it
works!" [sic!]
meaning that we can
write a lot of ad
hoc papers
containing a lot of
beautiful
Mathematics.
Finally, let us
note one more time that
throughout the entire history of
Physics and for that matter of
the rest of Natural Sciences,
the direction of theoretical
work was done, if you will,
"inwards" through a top-down
approach:
we
started with the
result (provided by
observations or
experiments) and
went "inwards"
attempting to find
an explanation for
the result obtained.
In
Mathematics, as we
have noted, the
method of obtaining
its results has been
exactly opposite
being, if you will,
in the "outwards"
direction through a
bottom-up
approach:
You
start with certain
primary propositions
called axioms beyond
which there are no
more meaningful
inquiries to be made
and then, you work
your way "up"
deriving results
which are build up
from the previous
results and so on.
It
is this bottom-up
"outwards" path from
the ground up that
we shall attempt to
initiate as the new
road or path and
direction of
studying Nature --a
path that may be
called the trutonian
(or the
trutonic) path
or the trutonic
road (truroad).
To
travel with us on
our trutonian/trutonic ascendent
bottom-up road,
you need not have
any special
mathematical
training because the
principles of TRUTON
can be understood
from reasoning
derived from
physical
considerations
alone.
The backbone of
TRUTON is causality, i.e., the big WHY. In TRUTON,
causality that needs to be of a
physical and not mathematical in
nature, is its centerpiece.
Describing Nature without its physical
casuality is not
acceptable in TRUTON.
For example, in TRUTON
talking and describing gravity
without knowing its cause and
origin of existence is not an
acceptable form of presentation.
In other words,
the descriptive approach without
causality in presenting
Nature is not the approach that
TRUTON will embrace. As Immanuel Kant so
eloquently put it,
"Causality
is the basis of
all scientific
work. Causality
is the condition
that renders
science
possible."
Because of that causality "skeleton" of TRUTON
that is physical and not
mathematical in nature, special
mathematical training or skills
are nor required in here.
In
TRUTON, causality
and origin of
phenomena will
always be of a
physical nature,
and never ever, be
of a mathematical
one as in the hocus-pocus
Quantum
Mechanics or
as in the lunatic
Einstein's
theory of Special
and General
Relativity!
Finally, the
Mathematics
that can be applied
to TRUTON's
blueprint can
give rise indeed to
a beautiful
theoretical "body"
whose elegance and
beauty only
Mathematics can
provide. But
before one can dress
TRUTON with
elegant garments
provided by
Mathematics, we need
first to know what
we are dressing up
and, making sure
that this is the
body that we want to
dress, for
crying out loud.
.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
For
instance, the
so-called Standard
Model of Quantum
Mechanics that
employs, at its mathematical
foundation,
Abelian
and non-Abelian
groups, cannot be
used in representing
Nature as those
mathematical group
structures do not
exist in the physical
space of Nature. They
only exist and reside
in a mathematically
cultivated Mind
(MCM).
In
short, a mathematical
result should
never ever be
converted
automatically into a physical
result
characterizing Nature
without first checking
its mathematical structural
foundation. For
instance, the Matrix
Math, as
interesting and
beautiful as it may
be, has no place, as a
foundation, in TRUTON,
because no such a
foundational structure
governs the space of
Nature.
