T R U T O N byKalman
Klim
Brattman Give
me the simplest form of
matter
and motion,
and I will construct, out of them, the world of
Nature.

"Give me matter,
and I will construct a world out of it."
Immanuel
Kant, Kant's Cosmology
("Universal
Natural History and Theory Of
Heavens")

7.
Spin as the Primal Regulator and Tool of
Creation

The
xenofluid
(XF)
was introduced as being derived from compressing
a xenobase
(XB)
mass. HOW
such a compressed XB-mass could be maintained in
Prena
and HOW, once formed, it can maintain its
existence in view of RENO
--are questions to be entertained, in here,
below. Since the xenofluid (XF) is not a
given
entity, but is a derived entity created out of
the xenobase (XB), it follows that all
properties of the xenofluid (XF) must be derived
and not be given. Thus, since the XF's
properties of characterization are to be
derived, and hence transmitted from the xenobase
(XB), it follows that our first task is to fully
grasp the XB's givenproperties of characterization, as well as,
to understand the rationality for their
existence.

On
the Foundational Properties
Characterizing the Xenobase
(XB)

In TRUTON, the xenobase (XB) represents the
absolute "bottom" line of material existence.
There is nothing "below" that line from where XB
could be derived. Because of that, we say that
the xenobase (XB) represents the ultimate
state level of matter (USLOM) which is the
level of the ergobase
(erB).
From that USLOM,
it is the aim of TRUTON to build up the entire
spectrum of material formations populating
Nature.
We can talk thus about
USLOM
as being the ultimate "line" representing the
lowest level of material existence.

With
that recognition that XB's physical parameters
of characterization must reflect XB's USLOM
existence, we are ready to recognize these
properties for its characterization:

1.
XB, by being at the
USLOM
line,
has the lowest non-null material density
called the Baselevel density
(BALDE).

2.
The Base
Resistance to Compression
(BAREC)property stating that XB has a base level
resistance to compression. If a compression
takes place beyond that base level of
resistance, XB will transform into a new
qualitatively state --the xenofluid
(XF)
state.

Remarks: . i)
BAREC is a necessary condition for
the xenobase (XB) to exist pursuant
to the resistance
limit mark of creation
(RL-UMOC). . ii)
BAREC's existence is due to XB's
ingrained
ergobase
(erB).

3.
The Unstretchable
Base Resistance (UBAR)
property stating that the XB is
non-stretchable. That property is required
because of XB's BALDE.

Remarks: . i)
IUBAR implies that a XB-mass cannot
be dented upon a hit because its
XF-surface is non-stretchable. Thus,
two XB-blocks upon collision will
deflect without a trace of
indentation. . ii) UBAR also implies
that a XB-surface acts as a natural
impenetrable wall.

4. The Impregnable
Cohesive Resistance (ICOR) property
stating that a XB-mass cannot be broken when
pulled appart up to an upper finite limit,
called the upper critical limit (UCL),
where it disintegrates.

Remark: .
By contrast to a XB-mass, a xenovoid
(XV) cloud, which also resides at
the baseline
of Nature (BON),
will
experience the opposite situation
vested in the XV's
Zero
Cohesive Resistance
(ZCOR)
which states that XV has no
resistance in being broken when
pulled apart.

5. The
Directional Tensioned Resistance to
Compression (DITREC ) property stating
that a stretched xenobase (XB) mass, called
tensioned xenobase (tXB), will have a
directional resistance towards compression
that is equal to the strength and opposite in
direction to the applied stretching
force.

Remarks: . i) Because of
the directional characteristic, a
radial tensioned XB, for instance,
is not tensioned transversely.
Because of
DITREC,
we say that a
tXB
is modulo directional. .ii) In a XB-point that
is subject simultaneously to two
distinct foreces, such as that of a
radial and a transversal force, the
net result (or the resultant) is
obtained from the well-known
Parallelogram Rule (PR) of
vector addition.

On
the Influence of Body and Contact
Forces
When Applied on a Xenobase (XB)
Mass

All forces in Nature can be grouped into
two (2) major categories: Body forces (BOFs), and Contact forces (COFs) that could
be point or surface forces.

By
a body
force (BOF),
we mean a force that acts on each and every
point of the body that is contrasted with the
contact
force (COF)
that is the force that acts at the point or
surface of impact between two colliding
objects.

Let
us note that inertial forces are defined
as the forces that carry and implement
inertia
and, that all inertial forces are
body-forces
(BOFs).
The introduced Principle
of Universal Inertia (PUI)
stands indeed as inertia's fundamental
charactheristic.

Let
us further note that an inertial force is a
real
force
indeed and, that it is most unfortunate of the
prevailing and misguided current representation
and association of inertial forces with being
fictitious, apparent, or imaginary entities.
You
see, Physics and Natural Sciences, in general,
do not deal with the study of fictitious,
imaginary entities and concepts that our Mind
can create, nor does it deals with the study of
our perceptions and illussions (physical or
imaginary). That study of the Mind or the study
of illusions
and perceptions
are studies completely outside of the realm and
scope of Physics and Natural
Sciences.

The
study of inertial forces as
real
forces carrying real
effects is pivotal indeed in our rational
understanding of Nature's modus operandi.
As already noted,
those inertial forces do not spring from matter,
but spring from motion, specifically from a
resistance to change an existing state of
motion. And that resistance springs from the
resistance
limit mark of creation (RL-UMOC)
stated
in the 4th UTPOT.
Therefore the origin of inertial forces must
reflect that unique characteristic.

On
this background of the inertial forces, let us
now move on and exmine the newly arrived motion
in Prena
--the Spin.

On
the Spin Forces in
Prena

The primeval hitoforces (hFs) in
Prena,
will generate through the collisions of its
xenobase (XB) masses, linear inertia
(LIN) as derived in PUI.
As such we can talk about linear inertial
forces (LIFs) that are indeed real forces
and not fictitious as currently they are
labeled. As already noted,
Isaac Newton in his seminal Principia
clearly recognized the
real
nature of those inertial forces that exist in
Nature: that of resistance
and impulse.
The fundamental difference between the
hitoforces and the inertial forces is that the
former are contact forces while the
latter are body forces.

Moving
on, we now recognize that the collisions of
XB-masses in Prena will generate, asides from
the linear
translatory
(LITRA)
bouncing motions resulted from deflections, a
new type of motion
--the
Spin.

Note: Before proceeding any
further, let us note that
the
Spin referred
herein is that of a continuous turning
or rotation and, as such, it needs not
be confused with the degenerated
nomenclature employed in Quantum
Mechanics nor it needs be confused with
an orbital revolution as employed in
Classical Mechanics with which needs to
be differentiated as noted
below.
Here in TRUTON, the Spin is always
referred as being the rotation upon
itself of an object around its own
particular axis --an axis that can
rotate freely in space, and nothing
else.

The apparition of the Spin, as a new type of
motion, is most significant indeed as new type
of forces associated with the Spin will emerge
and, as such, it is our task to recognize and
differentiate them.

Spin
As the Creator of the First Primal
Object: The
Spinoflon

The
Radifugal and Transifugal Forces of the
Spin

In
the Spin, the counterpart of the linear
inertia (LINI) is the rotational inertia
(ROTI) that also is a consequence of
PUI.
We can talk thus about the ROTI forces
associated to the Spin. A radial ROTI force
called the centrifugal (CF) body-force
that increases with the distance from the axis
of spin (AOS) is present.
In addition to the existing linear (LIN)
and radial
(RAD)corridors,
the Spin also generates a transversal(TRANS)
corridor.
Those three (3) corridors
--LIN,
RAD,
and TRANS--
will generate innate
compression-decompression (CODEC)
structural
grains for
the fabric of the compressible xenosubstance
(cXS) --the xenobase (XB)
and the xenofluid (XF)
that will determine their innate behavioral
characteristics.

Spin
forces residing in the
radial
(RAD)
corridor are called radifugal (RADI)
forces while those residing in the
TRANS
corridor are called transifugal (TRANSI)
forces.

In the TRANS corridor, the inertial
transifugal
(TRANSI) forces
that exist are the Euler (EUL) and
the Coriollis (CORI) forces.

.

G-G
de Coriolis

•
.The
Euler (EUL)
force, called also the azimuthal
or the transverse force and
named after Leonhard Euler, that
is perpendicular to the
centrifugal
(CF)
force, occurs only in a non-uniform
spin of accelerated or decelerated
rotation.
•
.The
Coriolis
(CORI)
force named after Gaspard-Gustave de
Coriolis whose effect of deflection
is known as the Coriolis effect,
on the other hand, occurs only in an
uniform constant
non-accelerated/decelerated
spin.

L.
Euler .

In
both above situations, the
Euler
(EUL)
and the Coriolis(CORI)
forces are always accompanied by the
centrifugal
(CF)
force whose strength continually
increases with the distance from the
axis of spin (AOS).

In the radial
(RAD)
corridor where the radifugal
inertial (RADI) forces operate, the
noted
centrifugal
(CF) force,
in a spinning material environment, will
generate an opposing force of resistance, called
centripetal (CP) force, pursuant to
RETOC.
That CP-force
creates the necessary force, and thus the
necessary condition, for the Spin to be able to
be sustained permanently.

A
rather complex picture of the forces of the Spin
begins to emerge as diagramed below

Primary
Types of Forces Generated by the
Spin:

Radial
(RAD): Radial movement
with its radifugal (RADI)
forces --the centrifugal (CF)
and the centripetal (CP)
forces.

Transversal
(TRANS): Transversal
movement
with its transifugal (TRANSI)
forces --the Euler (EUL) and
the Coriolis (CORI)
forces.

Innate
CODEC
Characteristics Ingrained by the
Spin

whose net effect provides

.The
First Fundamental
Universal Theorem Of Spin
(1st
FUTOS)

A
solid xenobase (XB) mass upon acquiring
a Spin in Prena, will transform into a
new entity called
spinoflon
(sFL) whose
shape is an oblate spheroid and, whose
XB axis of spin (AOS) is surrounded by
a permanent structured transifugal
xenofluid (XF) mass whose density
increases gradually and concentrically
outwards from the AOS.

Proof:

As
the XB-mass, at rest or in a linear
translatory motion (LITRA), begins to
spin, two inertial players are
immediately being formed:

the
radial
Centrifugal
(CF)
force,
and

the
transversal
Euler
(EUL)
force.

Those
two inertial body-forces
(CF
and
EUL)
will generate, by the
Parallelogram
Rule (PR),
a slanted transversal
resultant body-force called
the slantifugal (SF)
force. We call that phase,
where the resultant SF-force
exerts its inertial
body-influence on the spinning
XB-mass, the
nano
phase or
stage.

! PASS
WITH
MUCH CARE

.

The
two stated inertial body-forces
(CF
and EUL)
that are being generated concomitantly
in the nano phase
will generate, as stated, the resultant
SF-force.
That SF body-force created is capable
of compressing transversely the
spinning XB-mass due to the existence
of the Euler (EUL) force. Indeed, while
the XB-mass cannot be compressed
radially through the CF-force due to
XB's non-stretchable property --the
UBAR,
the
XB-mass can be compressed transversely,
as in an open accordion that begins to
close-in on one-side, by the influence
of the EUL-force.

That
transversal compression of the
EUL-force is being combined with the
concomitant existence of the CF-force
resulting, by the Parallelogram Rule
(PR),
in the slanted SF-force.
And because of the slanted nature of
the SF-force, the transversal
compression of the XB-mass, regardless
of its original shape, will result in
the creation of a
xenofluid
(XF)
mass whose shape will end up being
transformed into a prolate spheroid
(called also prolate ellipsoid
of rotation, figure at
left).

To
recognize the formation of a prolate
ellipsoid in this primal phase --the
nano
phase,
we need first to recognize that the
strength of the two components of the
SF-force (CF and EUL) increase quite
differently with the distance
r from the axis of spin
(AOS). And for those that are
mathematically inclined, the
centrifugal (CF) and Euler (EUL)
accelerations associated with those two
body-forces are proven to be markedly
different as follows:

(1)
a_{CF} = ^{2}^{ }r,
where
is the angular velocity,
and

(2)
a_{E} = -d/dt x r,

where
"x" is the cross product
operator and
is the angular velocity of
rotation with r
being the vector of the point
where the acceleration is
being measured relative to the
axis of spin (AOS). The minus
sign is placed to reflect that
the direction of the Euler
force is opposite to the
direction of the Spin's
rotation.

Because of XF's
RECO-force
of resistance, that is the
centripetal
force (CP)
of the spinning mass resulted from
RENO,
the compression of the newly created XF
cannot continue indefinitely. And that
is because a balance, called
xenobalance (XEBA), will be
formed where the compressional
body-force created is being stopped by
XF's RECO-force
of resistance, i.e., by the
centripetal
force (CP),
that increases with the increase of
XF's density.
[In
the mathematical jargon of differential
equations, a XEBA point is an
equilibrium point that is the
constant solution to the differential
equation that the slantifugal (SF)
force with the opposing XF's
RECO-force
of resistance will
generate.]

The
XEBA
created in the nano
phase
will be formed in each and every point
of the created XF being a balance
between the outward SF-force
and the XF's force of resistance --the
RECO.
With that equilibrium in place, the
ascending spin has leveled down to a
constant steady speed of rotation
marking the end of the nano
stage.

Due
to the Spin's constant steady speed of
rotation that now it has reached, the
transversal Euler (EUL) inertial force
ceases its existence. A new permanent
phase or stage takes place, called the
perma
phase or
stage,
whose permanency is going to be assured
by the creation of a new, permanent
XEBA
to be identified below.

The
opening that is left by the
disappearance of the Euler (EUL) force
is immediately occupied by the other
inertial transversal player from the
transifugal
(TRANSI)
"operators"
--the transversal
inertial
Coriolis
deflection
whose emergence is the direct result of
the rotational
inertia (ROTI).
That Coriolis deflection is generating
in fact an added mechanical slanted
transversal compression for the newly
created XF-mass.

The
strength of the Coriolis compression is
no longer function of the distance
r from the AOS being now
only function of the speed of the Spin
as seen below***.
Because of that constancy of the
Coriolis effect, the only variable left
is that of the growing centrifugal (CF)
force with distance from
AOS.

Thus,
in the new perma
phase,
its XEBA represents the balance between
the growing with distance from AOS of
the outward centrifugal (CF) force and
the countering XF's force of resistance
(RECO).
Now, as a result of that new
equilibrium, the prolate spheroid
formed in the nano
phase
will be transformed into an oblate
spheroid (figure at left) in this
new, ultimate perma
phase.

(***
To see that the Coriolis effect does
not depend of the distance from the
AOS, we need to see that the Coriolis
acceleration is not function of the
distance from the AOS.)

[Again,
for those mathematically
inclined, it can be proved
that
the Coriolis acceleration
a_{c}
is
a_{c}= -2X v,with
v
being
the velocity of a XF-particle
in the rotating body, and
being the angular velocity
vector. The "X", as before, is
the cross product
operator.]

The permanent ultimate picture created
is now complete. The result is the
creation of a new entity that
permanently spins, called spinoflon
(sFL), whose xenobase AOS is
surrounded by a gradal structured
XF-mass whose density increases with
the increase of distance from the AOS.
That newly formed entity that is in the
form of a sphere, the
spinoflon
(sFL),
represents indeed the very first
permanent creation of a primeval
XB-mass.

QED.

.

On
the Xenosubstance's Structural
Grains of its
Fabric

From
the 1st
FUTOS,
we have seen that the fabric
of the
environmental
xenofluid (eXF)
is
of a TRANSI
grain
derived from its corresponding
CODEC
characteristic of its
formation.

Asides
from the CODEC
characteristics generated by
the Spin,
we have noted
that the xenobase (XB),
xenofluid (XF), and hence
xenorigid (XR), can be formed
from a linear
(LIN)CODECgenerated
from an up-and-down
movement.

The
three type of CODEC(LIN,
RAD,
and
TRANS)
that the
xenosubstance
(XS)
can have is indeed a most
subtle recognition. The
radifugal
(RADI) and transifugal
(TRANSI)
grains
of
XS
that result from
CODECwill
play a pivotal role in
understanding the modus
operandi of
Nature.

Fundamental
Remark On
RENO
(FUROR): .With
the recognition of
CODEC,
we now recognize that
RENOoperates
on three (3) distinct
platforms: the linear
(LIN), the radial (RADI,
and the transversal
(TRANS). Thus, now we can
talk about
the
linear
RENO,
the
radifugal
RENO,
and the
transifugal
RENO.

On the Nature of the
Centripetal (CP)
Force
in a Spin
versus
in an Orbital
Motion

In
an orbital circular motion,
the centripetal (CP) force
F_{CP} is always
an
external
physical force such as the
force of gravity in a
planetary system. In the
spinning of a mass, however,
we have the reverse situation:
now, the CP-force is no longer
an external force, but is an
internal force of resistance
springing from
RETOC.
This distinction and
differentiation is paramount
indeed and, as seen below,
this lack of understanding and
differentiation together with
other related issue on the
circular motion has tormented
the great physicist Heinrich
Hertz for quite some
time.

Historical
Note

It
is perhaps of interest to note
the comments made by Heinrich
Hertz in the Introduction of
his 1899 posthumous book
"The Principles of
Mechanics" zooming on his
strong critique, now all but
forgotten, on the lack of
clarity of the force concept,
on pseudo-forces in general,
and that of
centrifugal/centripetal
force, in particular, as well
as on Newton's Third Law of
Motion (acton vs. equal
reaction):

"
We
swing in a circle a
stone tied to a
string, and in so
doing we are
conscious of exerting
a force upon a stone.
This force constantly
deflects the stone
from its straight
path. If we vary the
force, the mass of
the stone, and the
length of the string,
we find that the
actual motion of the
stone is always in
accordance with
Newton's second
law.

But
now the
[Newton's]
third law requires an
opposing force to the
force exerted by the
hand upon the stone.
With regard to this
opposing force the
usual explanation is
that the stone reacts
upon the hand in
consequence of
centrifugal force,
and that this
centrifugal force is
in fact exactly equal
and opposite to that
which we
exert.

Now
is this mode of
expression
permissible? Is what
we call centrifugal
force anything else
than the inertia of
the stone? Can we,
without destroying
the clearness of our
concepts, take the
effect of inertia
twice into account
--firstly as mass,
secondly as
force?...

...
Can we behave as if
we had already
asserted anything
about forces of this
kind in our laws, as
if by calling them
forces we could
invest them with the
properties of
forces?...

...The
only possible
explanation is that,
properly speaking
centrifugal force is
not a force at all.
Its name like the
name vis viva,
is accepted as
historic tradition;
it is convenient to
retain it, although
we should rather
apologize for its
retention than
endeavor to justify
it.

But,
what now becomes of
the demands of the
[Newton's]
third law, which
requires a force
exerted by the inert
stone upon the hand,
and which can only be
satisfied by an
actual force, not a
mere name?"

The
Principles
of
Mechanics
Presented
in a New
Form by
Heinrich
Hertz
Dover
Publications,
1956, pp.
5-6.

The derived spinoflon (sFL), resulted from the
existence of the Spin, represents indeed the
very first act of creation and, as such, we want
now to take a closer at the Spin --this primal
tool of creation.

On
the Spin as the Primal Tool of
Creation

PASS WITH MUCH CARE

The 1st
FUTOS
establishes that the
Spin,
and nothing else, is able to transform a XB-mass
into a permanent XF-mass which thus, it
represents the very first act of creation in
Nature. As long as there is a Spin whose
magnitude will not exceed a certain finite upper
limit, called the critical spin (cS), the
state of the XF-mass will be able to be
preserved. When the critical spin (cS) is being
achieved, the Spin plays now the role of a total
destroyer and the creator of a residual XB-dust
called xenodust (XD).

The
xenofluid (XF) mass created by the Spin
represents a new qualitative material
environmental medium (MEM) of Nature and, as
such, that primal creation of the Spin is
foundational in its nature. Now, since all that
transformation from xenobase (XB) to xenofluid
(XF) happens in Prena which is the generator of
the embryonal Nature, it follows that the Spin
is indeed the primary tool of Creation in
Nature.We
mark that truly astonishing finding and
recognition into

.

The
Twelfth
Universal
Transcendental
Principle Of TRUTON
(12th UTPOT)
Spin as the
Fundamental
Foundational
(FUFO)
Tool of
Creation

The
Spin, as the primal
tool of Creation,
must be responsible
for the shaping-up of
all natural
foundational
formations
(FOFOs)
in
Nature.

Asides from creating a new
qualitative material medium of
Nature, the recognition that
the Spin must be responsible
for shaping-up the entire
Nature is truly monumental. As
we look around, "up" into the
cosmos or "down" into the atom
and below, we see that
everything, without exception,
spins! Wow!

It
is as if somehow all
objects of Nature would
tell us:
We are
here because of the
Spin!
We are,
in the way that we are,
because of the Spin!

To the spinoflons (sFLs) introduced above in the
1st
FUTOS,
we can associate now these results:

The
Second
Fundamental
Universal Theorem Of Spin
(2nd
FUTOS):
Matter's Evolutionary Theorem of Spin
(METOS)

The
spin of the spinoflon can never
decrease in
magnitude.

Proof:

The
proof of this theorem springs from the
fact that with each collision, a
spinoflon can only increase the
magnitude of its spin. And that is
because of these two (2)
observations: .
1)
that the axis of spin (AOS) is not
fixed in space and, as such, with each
additional collision the AOS of the
spinoflon will be able to move and
rotate freely in any direction.
And, .
2)
that a rotation of 180º of the AOS
amounts to a reversal in the direction
of the spin.

QED.

Historical/Mythological
Note: In Greek mythology, METOS
(the goddess of wisdom) was the first
wife of ZEUS --the Greek Supreme God!
[sic!]

.

The
First
Corollary to METOS: The Critical
Spin

All
spinoflons can have a maximum
constant magnitude of the
Spin, beyond which they will
perish.

The proof of this Corollary
is straightforward, as with
each increase of the Spin,
the spinoflons will
increase their material
density until they will
reach their maximum
attainable density, called
the critical density
(cD), of the xenorigid
(XR) state. Once there,
upon additional increases
of the Spin, there will be
a moment when their
centripetal force will be
able to break-up and
rupture their xenorigid
(XR) masses ending thus the
life of the spinoflon. At
the break-up, we say that
the spinoflon has reached
its critical
spin
(cS).
As the spinoflons
breaks-up, its flying parts
will disperse into the
space.

QED.

The
Second
Corollary to METOS: Spin as the
Ultimate
Terminator

All
spinoflons have a finite
existence.

.

For the proof of this
Corollary, we use the
classical method employed
in Mathematics called in
Latin "Reductio ad
Absurdum" ('Reduction
to the Absurd' or 'Proof by
Contradiction') that we
have already used
before.
.Let's
assume then that there is a
spinoflon of infinite
existence. That would imply
that the respective
spinoflon, by repeatedly
increasing its spin, will
be able to exceed the
critical
spin
(cS)
--an absurdity, of course,
by the 1st Corollary to
METOS above.

QED.

We continue now with this page by making these
additional observations with respect to the
Spin's fundamental role in shaping up Nature.

Spin
as the Ultimate Regulator of Capping or
Fencing
the Evolution's Ascension

From
the above succinct presentation of spinoflons,
we were able to see the emergence of a most
remarkable dual property of the Spin:

that
of being the
primal
underlying tool of creation
and,

that
of being the
ultimate
destroyer of unlimited ascension of
evolution.

That dual opposite roles of
the Spin --that of the primeval creator and as
the ultimate destroyer --is truly astonishing.
Because of that stunning duality, we call the
Spin as being the primal ultimate regulator
of Nature (PURON).

If
we define brute matter
(bM)
as being the admixture of xenobase (XB) and
xenovoid (XV) and write this as
bM={XB, XV},
then it follows that
bM
is the immediate successor of
prematter
( pM)
i.e.,
pM={XB, VO}
and is the precursor or forerunner of
matter
(M),
i.e., M={cXB, XV}.

With
the introduction of the brute matter
(bM)
concept, we are able to "see" now --through
PURON--
the fundamental role that Spin has in the
regulation of matter's ultimate
rejuvenation
cycle
that is vested in the perpetual creation of
"new" matter out of the brute matter
(bM)
that is being continuously replenished from
the disintegration of the "old" matter. The fact
that the Spin is able ultimately to destroy what
it has created is most remarkable indeed as that
establishes the underlying cyclical foundation
upon which Nature operates. The mediator of all
this is the Collision
--the ultimate master of creation (MAC)
responsible, as well, for the creation of the
Spin, in the first place.

We
call that ultimate perpetual cycle of Nature
produced by the Spin, the grand ultimate
everlasting cycle (GUEC) of Nature. The
primeval XB-blocks of Prena gliding in space are
indeed part of that
GUEC.
We mark that fundamental recognition into

The
Thirteenth
Universal
Transcendental Principle Of TRUTON
(13th UTPOT):
The Spin as the Ultimate Evolutionary
Regulator of Nature

The
Spin is not only the primal tool of
starting evolution, but also is its
ultimate regulator putting a cap or a
fence of how far the evolution can grow
and ascend. That is to say that the
Spin ultimately would pave the way for
evolution to stay confined or fenced
and not be allowed to ascend
indefinitely. That cap, called
uplevel
cap
(upC),
is being achieved through an
evolutionary self-destruction process
of the entire ascended evolved matter,
at the point or stage of evolution,
when and where the Spin's magnitude is
so great that it can no longer be
supported or maintained by the created
object.

The Spin, as the foundational tool of creation
and regulator of Nature, brings to the fore the
concept of evolution --a subject that forms now
our next page. So, if you are ready to continue,
let us move on.
.